User talk:The Terrible Toes

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

I've been seeing you around reverting vandalism and warning users, and I felt that leaving you this barnstar was the least I could do. Your diligence and hard work patrolling for vandalism has been absolutely helpful... thank you so much :-). Recent changes patrolling is certainly not an easy area that many editors enjoy or take time to help with; it's a thankless job that will go without appreciation or acknowledgement, it's repetitive work that is often the subject of criticism (especially if you accidentally mess up - something everybody does), and you'll occasionally find vandals and trolls harassing your user and user talk page to try and get under your skin in retaliation. Please know that your time and effort does not go unnoticed (I absolutely take note of your amazing work), and that what you do is greatly appreciated. If you need help with patrolling for vandalism, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to message me on my talk page. Thanks again! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP revert

Just FYI, a user is permitted to blank their talk page, even if it's a block notice; the only thing they can't remove is a declined block appeal while the block is in effect. 331dot (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

aight, thanks for tellin TerribleToes sõnum mulle! 22:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PROD notice removal.

Hi there. I saw you reverted a users removal of a PROD tag at MS Regal Star. Just letting you know that the user was fine to do so, and that it was not a speedy deletion tag that he removed in the first place. Best regards. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defamatory

The content about Bishop Obinim infringes on his right. The account are false and defamatory Joseph Osei Oppong Brenya (talk) 23:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Danielwerles

I saw that you left an only warning for this user regarding his edit. Why did you leave an only warning compared to a normal warning? Thanks -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: explanation on the anti-vandalism page. Sorry for the inconvenience, fixing now TerribleToes sõnum mulle! 01:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Terrible Toes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]