User talk:The TRUE Adoring Fan
Wikipedia is based on verifiability, not truth. You are changing the text while not changing citations. Unless you can find reliable sources to back up your changes, it's best to keep the correctly cited version. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- What? Wikipedia doesn't accept truth? What kind of bull shit is that? So you're saying just because someone else says something, it's good enough to put on an article, and if something is a generally stated fact or an undeniable observation, it's not sutible for placement on Wikipedia? If that's true then I believe this website should recieve no donations and deserves to be removed from the internet. Good day to you Sir! The TRUE Adoring Fan (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- From the first sentence of WP:V, an official policy: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true." Read Wikipedia's guidelines before going on a rant. If you don't like the rules, no one is forcing you to contribute. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 06:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll answer you wherever I feel like it. As for accuracy, you have yet to show that the references do not support what's in the text. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 15:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I added a different citation, so there is no issue. Go away and stop bitching. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 13:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Rather than fix issues in a non-disruptive manner you resorted to blanking and one-liners in edit summaries, accusing me of bad faith edits when I accidentally overwrote an old revision, and then complain when I have in fact added a citation which supports the fact... sarcasm is not becoming. You are being a troll. I have asked you to stop editing my talk page, please respect that. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 01:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I added a different citation, so there is no issue. Go away and stop bitching. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 13:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll answer you wherever I feel like it. As for accuracy, you have yet to show that the references do not support what's in the text. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 15:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- From the first sentence of WP:V, an official policy: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true." Read Wikipedia's guidelines before going on a rant. If you don't like the rules, no one is forcing you to contribute. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 06:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)