User talk:The Real Saints

Image tagging for Image:Reduced06dobbie.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reduced06dobbie.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Russell Brand

Your recent edit to Russell Brand (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Russell Brand, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 18:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Dobbie

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Stephen Dobbie, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 18:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Alex Rae, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sbrools ^{(talk . contribs)} 22:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seabird, Shilpa Shetty, and Dundee

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Your juvenile, unhelpful edits of 2 February were all immediately undone, so I don't see what's interesting about doing them. eritain 11:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]