User talk:The Psycho

Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of The Psycho

Welcome!

Hello, The Psycho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Herostratus 04:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Jews Did WTC"

If you think this is notable enough for inclusion, make your cause on the talk page of the article. If you keep posting and reverting this, people are going to keep reverting you right back. Maybe if you make a strong logical case for its inclusion this will change and you'll get a little respect. Right now this is getting stupid. --Kickstart70·Talk 22:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody loves Eric Raymond

Hello. I am curious about the reason to remove the frame in the Everybody Loves Eric Raymond article. I think it illustrates the style of the cartoon (cutout heads pasted on different body). Am I missing a policy reason for not having it there ? Can you please explain what you mean with the Edit summary "pov pic" ? Thanks. --Ruleke 07:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question?

So what's your deal? Herostratus 00:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not finding that your edit history is showing a pattern of growth or is tending toward excellence. Do you have any questions? Would you like some assistance on choosing articles to work on? Herostratus 05:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banned user

Psycho, that user is banned from posting anywhere on the project. Please don't restore his posts. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 05:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of bolding in the Sam Korn RfC

Please be aware that when you bold things you write it is both disruptive to the eye and makes people less inclined to listen to you. JoshuaZ 14:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-adding it, as well. I'm trying to keep the talk page formatted properly, and you are not helping. —BorgHunter ^ubx (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First make sure what you think is true before you comment

Doreme1248(in Chinese wikipedia known as Ilovehk1248) kept adding information based on bias of Falungong into Chinese Wikipedia, so he got blocked. In my opinion, Doreme1248 deserves what he got. I am one of the administrators and also a bureaucrat in the Chinese Wikipedia, and I am from Taiwan, no relationship with the Chinese government or Chinese Communist Party. This matter is totally not related to any censorship from the PRC government. Pubuhan took his action after discussed with several administrators in an online chatting room with no objection. Please don't get mislead by Doreme1248.--zh:User:Theodoranian 18:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about you deal with these instead of deleting them?

In other words, I and other users are right here watching, so these problems aren't just going away. --Kickstart70·Talk 02:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should talk

Hi. I'm not finding your comments, such as admonishing other editors to "cut the bullsh*t" and "Jimbo Wales has drew (sic) first blood, we must attack!!!!!!!!!!" to be helpful or useful to what we are doing here. I think we need to discuss your approach to editing Wikipedia, OK? What are you trying to accomplish? Herostratus 21:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think by now it's quite obvious that he's just here to vandalize and cause trouble. --Kickstart70·Talk 04:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right. So what's the procedure? Herostratus 12:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the user here to hopefully get some administrator attention. --Kickstart70·Talk 16:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caution

Please don't post messages on pages that are completely irrelevant to the topic of the page. It can be seen as spam and Wikipedia regards adding spam to articles or talk pages as a form of vandalism. Thank you. Herostratus 21:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing messages of this type is extermely poor form. For an alternative, why not check out Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib)

Blocked

Hi, you've been blocked for 24 hours for violating wikipedia's three revert rule policy. Although this is not generally enforced in user space, you have reverted this page a total of 7 times in the last 24 hours to cover up good faith edits, attempts at dialogues, and warnings about your behavior; this is unnacceptable. Please note that it is considered very bad form to delete anything from your talk page, rather than archiving it; due to your attempts at avoiding responsibility for your edits, this is not only bad form, but unnacceptable. I hope you can contribute in good faith upon your return. --He:ah? 22:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Blatant vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Lolicon, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Herostratus 19:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't "archive" warning and block notices so soon after receiving them, especially not under a deceiving archive name that purports to be from 2005. --Cyde Weys 21:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate link

Hello. Please do not add links to 'wikipedophilia.com' to Wikipedia articles. They are inappropriate, because we discourage self-referential links. You may also wish to know that editing Wikipedia to further an anti-Wikipedia agenda is not permitted. Thanks. -Will Beback 01:03, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for one month

You have been blocked for one month due to linkspamming at Wikipedia and Talk:Wikipedia. Johntex\^talk 01:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been indefinitely blocked for using sock-puppetts in a futile attempt to evade the original block. Johntex\^talk 01:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]