User talk:The Paper Press

Welcome!

I hope you enjoy my contributions!

Why do you repeatedly redirect WTHK?

There is ample precedent for retaining "former radio station" articles. There is a clear link to WJJZ near the top of the article. I can understand that you might be exceedingly satisfied to have your jazz station back -- but why destroy WTHK's article? I'm reverting. Rpresser 01:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Radio stations change call letters, frequencies, cities of registry, owners and transmitter locations. The concept of radio station identity is entirely fluid. What happens when some new company in Arizona decides to register WTHK again for a totally different purpose?

I think the best practice is to be keep detailed history of a callsign in that callsign's article, with just a mention and a link when a station "flips". There may be another way. But (b) it needs to be consistent, and (b) it needs to be logical, so someone who moves back to Jersey and wonders what happened to WTHK can find it easily without having to use Search, finding it buried in an article about some smooth jazz station. Rpresser 23:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I certainly see your POV. I don't happen to agree -- as a database administrator I've grown used to the idea of a primary key and a callsign sure seems like one, or like it was intended to be one. However, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Radio_Stations#Stations_with_call_signs, which states

Note that if a station changes callsigns, its full history should be listed in its present or last callsign whenever possible, as its old callsign may subsequently be reassigned to a new station. ... In some rare situations, however, it may be unclear whether a new call sign should be considered a successor to an old one, or an entirely new station. If there is any doubt, solicit opinions on this project's talk page.

I think this is a situation where we could bring it all up on Talk:WTHK (former New Jersey radio station).

On another note entirely, given the end part of your User page, you might be amused by this: {{User:Feureau/UserBox/ubx-5}}

ubx-5

This user uses entirely too many userboxes.

Rpresser 01:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:NewWJJZLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NewWJJZLogo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MichaelTozzi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MichaelTozzi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DI Citations

Hi there. I'm working on improving the content of the Destination ImagiNation article, and noticed that you've made contributions to the article regarding comparisons of DI and OM. As part of the cleanup, I'm trying to add good references to the page. I have been told that if there are not citations for all the claims in the Criticisms section, I should remove it. Noticing that you added that section, I would appreciate it if you could cite the facts in the section to improve the quality of the article. Thanks. -AtionSong 23:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Area code 856

I've nominated Area code 856, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Area code 856 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Area code 856 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Area code 856 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --trey 02:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of RenWeb

RenWeb, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that RenWeb satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RenWeb and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of RenWeb during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Domthedude001 01:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smith Terminal

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detroit_Metropolitan_Wayne_County_Airport&diff=134396743&oldid=133943346

What you posted is not referenced. It looks like Wikipedia:Original research and POV. Neither are acceptable here, so the entry has been removed. WhisperToMe 22:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Zanzibar Blue

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Zanzibar Blue, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Zanzibar Blue seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Zanzibar Blue, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NewWJJZLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:NewWJJZLogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:OldWJJZLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OldWJJZLogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RenWeb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RenWeb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RenWeb (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh 666 10:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]