User talk:The Other Saluton

Welcome

Hello, The Other Saluton! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 10:37, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

FC Dynamo Moscow in Europe

Hi there, I mostly used http://www.klisf.info/numeric/ and http://www.klisf.info/inter/ek/ It's mostly for Russian and ex-USSR teams though.

Cheers!

Geregen2 (talk) 18:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Other Saluton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've never done anything wrong...

Decline reason:

You're not blocked! -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 05:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Or if you are, you're behind an autoblock and would need to use {{unblock-auto}}. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 05:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA U21

Hey, i did not removed it, i just made it unvisible. When you edit the Standings scroll down till the end and there it is. If Romania wins and the points are equal again we can just make it visible again. :-) Kante4 (talk) 12:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell, I still can't see it. The Other Saluton (talk) 12:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Click here and then scroll down and there you see the line. Kante4 (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my gosh, it's a template! Okay, thanks. The Other Saluton (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. ;-) Kante4 (talk) 12:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kharitonov

Thank you for tidying the above page. Leonid Mikhailovich Kharitonov is still alive and still occasionally makes public appearances. Although he once lived during the Soviet era, he does not now. I have sent him a message so that he can give an opinion as to whether he wishes to be described as Soviet. You may or may not find that his son comes in and corrects this description (depending on Kharitonov's opinion on the matter). Please be understanding about this sensitive matter. Thank you. --Storye book (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kononenko

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kononenko, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.kononenko.info.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enter the Void

Regarding your recent edit to the article, please note that Thomas Bangalter was not credited as the film's composer. The credit on IMDB refers to the use of his track "The End", which is a preexisting track Bangalter produced for the film Irreversible and reused for Enter the Void. The official credit for Bangalter seen in the actual film is "sound effects director". Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. jhsounds (talk) 19:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kryukov

Дык он и не должен быть виден — он нужен только для метаданных и указывает, что текст написан на русском языке (а не, скажем, на болгарском или украинском). Очень полезно для поисковых двигателей и прочих систем автоматизации, работающих с текстом статей. А кавычки это и вовсе простая грамматика (английская, не русская), и то, на каком языке написан термин, роли в этом не играет. Можно, с точки зрения грамматики, с таким же успехом использовать вместо кавычек курсивное начертание, но тогда во-первых пропадает контраст с транслитерацией, а во-вторых курсивное начертание текста не на латинице специфически осуждается правилами Википедии.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 10, 2011; 21:21 (UTC)

Nomination of FC Terek Grozny in Europe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FC Terek Grozny in Europe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Terek Grozny in Europe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Maimai009 20:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminated vs unable to qualify

I noticed on some of the Euro 2012 qualifying group articles, you've changed "eliminated" to "unable to qualify" on the next match scenarios. Just curious, is there a difference in meaning of which I'm unaware, or is it just a preference on your part? LarryJeff (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just believed OpenFuture who wrote "Eliminated implies you aren't allowed to play anymore" in this revision and thought all groups should follow the same pattern. The Other Saluton (talk) 04:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I can see that logic. Personally I prefer "eliminated" because it stands out more instead of having "unable to win the group" and "unable to qualify" which seem too similar but I guess I'll get over it. LarryJeff (talk) 23:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

For your work on the en. wikipedia. Enjoy! Winner 42 Talk to me! 12:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yum yum! Tasty! The Other Saluton (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the contributions to The Human Centipede!

Hi there, thanks for all your recent help on The Human centipede. In case your interested, there's a discussion about having the article on the main page on Halloween this year. Some think this is a good idea, others do not. Thoughts always appreciated :) See Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests cya! Coolug (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I don't know if you're especially interested, but the article has now been officially nominated, the discussion is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, all thoughts are very much appreciated.

Good job by the way on the centipede 2 article, I've taken a bit of a back seat on this one as my girlfriend has more or less banned me from letting the centipede 2 article take over my life in the same way centipede 1 did :) I'm seeing finally going to see this sequel at the Leeds film fest showing next week so I'm looking forward to discovering if it really is all that horrible. Have you seen it yet? cya! Coolug (talk) 10:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on receiving the Dr. Heiter Award!

For your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence) I present you with the Dr. Heiter Award. "Feed!"

Hi there, thank you for your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence). When the article was first started in October 2009 is was but a tiny stub that was immediately tagged for deletion, but thanks to the efforts of wikipedia editors that tiny acorn has grown into a great oak tree of an article. The Human Centipede (First Sequence) is now a Featured Article and on the 17th June 2010 the article received its 1,000,000th page view! The article routinely receives over five thousand views a day and is in the top 1,000 most viewed Wikipedia articles!

On Halloween 2011, the article was the Main Page Featured Article!

The Dr. Heiter Award was created to reward editors who have made positive contributions to the article. It can be presented by any wikipedia user to anyone who has helped the article grow. This might be by adding new content, fixing any errors or reverting vandalism.

Thanks! Feed! Coolug (talk) 17:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Russian football transfers summer 2012

FC Dynamo Moscow transfers were from the lineups of Dynamo squad (and the reserve team) that are preparing for the season right now.

Igonin is on a tryout with Salyut Belgorod: http://xn--90aisup.xn--p1ai/news/sport/2012/06/15/65409.html

Some others must have been from transfermarkt.

Cheers!

Geregen2 (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Luka Đorđević

Cool, thank you. Sorry for missing that.

Geregen2 (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BOLDTITLE

Please see WP:BOLDTITLE. To quote that page, "In general, if the article's title is absent from the first sentence, do not apply the bold style to related text that does appear." Since the phrase "2006 FIFA World Cup squads" does not appear in the opening sentence of the 2006 FIFA World Cup squads article, that is the bit that applies. – Pee Jay 15:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What a moronic rule. The Other Saluton (talk) 15:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether or not it's moronic, which it isn't, it's still a rule we have to follow. – Pee Jay 19:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no, we don't. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules. The Other Saluton (talk) 03:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's no use either in publishing ages, caps, and clubs as of the opening day. The point is to give the latest data before the tournament. If we give data as of the opening day, it's never clear whether the caps on this day itself are counted or not. Also, the players who have birthdays on this day will have one year added to their age, which makes them somehow stand out for no obvious reason. The Other Saluton (talk) 04:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even apart from that, you might have checked what you were reverting. I now have to correct the caps of Russian players in the 2002 squad again. Thank God I cited the sources. The Other Saluton (talk) 04:46, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Unnecessary"

The "unnecessary" was referring to your replacement of the FIFA trigrammes with the countries' full names in the "clubnat" parameters. There is no need to do that since the template is clearly capable of supporting the trigrammes and they reduce the size of the article. But since you mention it, we use "MSV Duisburg" per this essay by User:ArtVandelay13 and we use "Bayer Leverkusen" since that is the club's most commonly recognised name. In the case of "FC Seoul", it is similar to "FC Zürich" and therefore retains the "FC". – Pee Jay 10:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on 2014 FIFA World Cup squads. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is using the word "bloody" what you call a personal attack? Anyway, personal attacks may damage the community but they make articles better. Which is much more important. The Other Saluton (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And you're going to let that, uh, guy keep vandalising the article? The Other Saluton (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2014 FIFA World Cup squads. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Spinning Spark 17:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for the correction on Abuşev. Per WP:BLP we have a responsibility to get living people's named spelled correctly, that was a good edit. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Terminator video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarah Connor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Russian football transfers summer 2015 page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source it all yourself (reply)

That's not how Wikipedia works. Content should be verifiable. Do you have a reliable source showing that he is still on loan? SLBedit (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Other Saluton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sergey Dmitriev listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sergey Dmitriev. Since you had some involvement with the Sergey Dmitriev redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Adam9007 (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]