User talk:The Observer2

Philosophical pages

There are many encycolpedias that exposes the philosophical subject in their pages, it is called philosophical texts, and the point of view is interesting and useful for studying and also for reading. There are links for that matter, that have been already posted in the proposed page.

The philosophical texts are a matter of study of some content; and it develops intellectual independence because it is possible to rely for your information on the opinions of other ones, as it comes from a concrete historical subject.

Sincerely

The Observer2 (talk) 13:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primeval love

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Primeval love, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Primeval love. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Primeval love

I have nominated Primeval love, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primeval love. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stairways

The thing I most like about stairways, which I have enjoyed since I was three, is counting the steps. I could go up and down stairways for hours just counting the steps each way. Counting steps is how I learnt my times tables, by going up stairs two at a time, three at a time, and so on. I've had balance problems for the last few years which were probably to do with being born premature, so it's harder for me to climb stairs now.

As for classical music, my favourite composers are Bach and Schubert. I like anything with a good melody, and they certainly have a lot to offer in this regard. Beethoven did some amazing things with musical form, and the last movement of his ninth symphony is incredibly uplifting. I like virutosic piano works with substance to them ... therefore I adore Chopin's Études and works like La Campanella by Liszt. I hadn't heard the Consolations before ... but having heard No. 3 on Youtube, it certainly is a beautiful melody.

I can play piano and sing, but I'm not that good at either. I prefer analysing music and listening to it. Where is your song page?

Regards, Graham87 02:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Liebestraum is a beautiful piece of music ... and so is Impromptu number 3 by Schubert. I like the first impromptu in C minor for its sense of adventure, and the seventh one for the way Schubert varies the theme. I liked the first piece that I heard the best ... you have a good voice. I'll send you a midi file of one of my compositions; I'm trying to find it now. Can you enable and confirm an email address in your preferences? That would be the easiest way of exchanging email addresses ... spambots crawl Wikipedia looking for email addresses to spam. Graham87 14:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]