User talk:The Nut

Hello, The Nut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Pohick2 (talk) 20:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What did you do on Pro Greens page?

? Everything i wrote on it, got deleted :/

I did not delete anything. Take a good look and you will see. --The Nut (talk) 11:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I never said you deleted anything :S I said whenever i wrote anything on it..it got deleted :( But what did you write on it? Thats what i asked :] MLovesEminem (talk) 11:52, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the caps and completed the external links. --The Nut (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhhhhhhh :] You could have done something abit more useful :x MLovesEminem (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nuts tend to do useless things you know XP --The Nut (talk) 12:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

haha thats quite funny :L You nut :x hehe :P MLovesEminem (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC) so how are you? (: —Preceding unsigned comment added by MLovesEminem (talk • contribs) 10:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. Right now, I feel \o/ --The Nut (talk) 06:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to SonicWALL has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan (talk) 16:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I saw from your edit, I missed the the 1 from 1991, sorry and thanks for helping out. I'll doublecheck next time.--The Nut (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Calendars of 2009

A tag has been placed on Calendars of 2009 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace ^talk 14:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, cause this was a totally incorrect edit. --The Nut (talk) 14:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dermatology

Any interest in dermatology? If so, we are always looking for more help at the Dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push. I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. ---kilbad (talk) 18:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind offer. This subject unfortunately is beyond my fringe (^_-) --The Nut (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Torfhaus

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Torfhaus, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. --Bermicourt (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, The Nut. You have new messages at DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

POTY comment

Thank you for your comment at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-06-21/Sister projects. Please note that comments are welcome at the talk page only and not on the article.--Forty two^{You talkin' to me?} 14:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forty two (talk • contribs) [reply]

Sorry, I am sooooooooooooo confused here in this worldwide wikilabyrinth --The Nut (talk) 20:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know. All this is so overwhelming. I had already added your comment on the talk page. Since you posted the comment there, I have removed the duplicate. I would also draw your attention to the fact that page you link to does not show the quote you are referring to there. Also please read Help:Link. Cheers.--Forty two^{You talkin' to me?} 21:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish talkback

Hello, The Nut. You have new messages at DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]