Jump to content

User talk:The New Fox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Baleted, If I wanted your template I would of asked for it.

WAMMA edits

[edit]

Continuing to edit what was already discussed can result in a 3RR ban, just so you know. The belt was in fact on the line, WAMMA isn't a promotion, it's a sanctioning body ala WBC, WBA, IBF in boxing. Championship bouts are at their own discretion, so the bout won't always be a 5-round fight. As you can see, WAMMA did in fact >>>>>sanction<<<<< (doesnt mean the title is on the line jackass) Fedor vs. Rogers, but again, the title being on the line was at their discretion. Here is a screen shot from their home page (http://www.gowamma.com) indicating the title was on the line during the bout http://i52.tinypic.com/10gy6c6.png

And here is an article from WAMMA's website with some quotes also indicating the title was on the line. It does nothing of the sort you havnt provided sufficent info http://gowamma.com/news-and-events-detail/125/fedor-vs-rogers-fight-sanctioned-by-wamma

"Recognizing Fedor as the undisputed WAMMA heavyweight champion means that Fedor is the world champion wherever and whenever he fights."-Vadim Finkelchtein (Don't take this quote out of context though. It doesn't necessarily mean the title is on the line whenever Fedor fights, only when WAMMA sanctions the bout. Fedor vs. Werdum wasn't for the title)

Oh yeah because vadiums really a genuis of the sport he promoted who he claims is the worlds best fighter & prevents him from doing what earned him the title!

"Putting a title on the line just provides the fighters with more incentive to perform at their best"-Scott Coker right how strange it isnt on the striokeforce website nor the event itself...... Delinquent1904 (talk) 00:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is all lovely but until I clearly see "title on the line" whereas your "proof" says WAMMA is "sanctioning a 3 round event" & doesnt mention title as well as the comintators confirming during the event the title is not on the line I'd say you need to stop fellating fedor & smell the freaking roses

Strikeforce officials and Emelianenko’s management both confirmed to Sherdog.com Thursday that the belt had been presented earlier that day during a pre-fight press conference for promotional purposes only, as WAMMA is a sponsor of Saturday’s event.

During the conference, Strikeforce CEO Scott Coker had been asked if the title would be recognized that night, and he’d noted off-the-cuff that he believed it would. However, the promotion later clarified that the heavyweight matchup will remain a three-round, non-title bout.<<<from sherdog november 7th the most current article on the matter excluding the DVD which also confirms what i said.


Jackass? what are you, childish? That article you provided was dated November 5th, the article I provided was from the 7th. It was a last minute change.Delinquent1904 (talk) 02:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well the prove it, Nothing you have provided actually provides concrete evidence past declaring Fedor current champion.

Again, it was at the sanctioning body's discretion. WAMMA's homepage itself even announces the title was on the line for christ's sake, did you not see the screen shot above. The commentators are subective, using them as a source is not reliable. It's done, get over it.Delinquent1904 (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I quote "Fedor vs Rogers Fight Sanctioned by WAMMA" Just like shooto sanctions the events i run, idiot! You havnt provided anything past heresay & nothing that directly refers too it.

You have no solid evidence past heresay by wikipedias standards (the ones you claim to uphold) that is not good enough!

Comentators are subnjective? the people who have live feeds who are there to keep the fan informed are subjective. No they are important & they are one thing more so then either of us INFORMED.