Jump to content

User talk:The Monsta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article Monsta has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Monsta. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, it would help if you weren't submitting articles that weren't full of lies, such as your having a million-selling album at age 12, or "His single cover song "By Myself" Won "The best solo song" for the MTV Awards in 2007." There's no such MTV award. Not surprisingly, you provided no sources (see WP:V) to back up your outlandish claims. Don't waste our time. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Monsta. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, --Orange Mike | Talk 13:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]