User talk:The Master 2121

Master2121

you are AWESOME. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Master 2121 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont vandalise my talk page The Master 2121 (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Master2121[reply]

The Block situation

To anyone reading this, this explains what is below, I joined wikipedia for the one purpose of helping to edit a show that I liked, I would have just made the edit anonymous but due to a past experience, I felt that it is better to be a user, so i made my first edit and edited the date on the second and third episodes , because i know they are going to do it in three episodes at a time just like they did with the first, so i figured i would make a contribution as a way of giving back to the show, some time went by and i went back to check if anyone had heard anything new, or someone had put a new thing on the page, to my surprise my date that i had made changed back, it was like i didn't even matter i went to the edit history to see who made this change, because i didn't, know if it was someone who made a mistake or someone who was just being a bad person, there was nothing there except something about a source i couldn't understand, so i went back into editing and typed up a hidden message, telling that person about the season 3 part 1 argument, nothing happened, i also changed my dates back, next thing i know I'm getting angry messages from someone else on my talk page (keep in mind I didn't even know what a talk page was), i tried talking back to that person to reason with, but they never said anything, i went to check my dates again and surprised another person had changed them, but this person left no message, so i kept changing the dates back from before 2-3 times in 4-5 days, finally i got a message after i left another hidden message in the edit folder, a person had told me to stop so i went to their talk page and left a message onto one of their sections, to my greater surprise they left me a message, i told them what happened and they said to 1. make my own section on their talk page because they like to be organized and 2. to go talk about my edit on the season 3 talk page itself, i was so shocked to learn the season had its own talk page (he also told me about edit war and that's when i learned what was happening to me), so i went on there to voice my complaints, i thought that the other people would have already made a section ready for me to talk, but nothing so i made my own and changed the dates ready for someone to come and discuss, then it happened a person came, someone who wasn't changing my edits but someone who came to talk like reasonable people, and said my idea was fairly accurate, i was so happy, because i thought that everyone would come and we could finally discuss, but no one did they just kept having an edit war with me, and i knew that i wasn't going to take that lying down, i know i matter, so i kept fighting, but after awhile of what felt like 1 VS 100 (at this point i dont know if they were real people or one persons pretending to be 12), I decided to through in the towel, i made the changes back and left ( i also got tired of them changing my edits but not responding to my messages on their talk pages), but not before leavening a message that said when i am proven right i will return, then to my surprise i get the 48 hour block, because even though i told the truth and tried to explain things to the other admin, they said that there was a zero policy for edit wars no matter what side starts it, So my only hope is that i may be blocked but at least some of those other people probably are to. the rest of whats down there is just me trying to explain what happened, which is why i wrote this new section, to be honest i still dont know what i did to get everyone so freaked out over a date, because i didn't mess with anyone else stuff and only focused on my stuff which was a date edit which many people will probably agree on if you asked, I'm also checking out the 5 pillars of wikipedia someone mentioned on my talk page, and i even found out that the blocking system has received a lot of criticism and that edit wars happen a lot on here. So there you have my side of the story, since no one ever really cared to ask for it, do i think i should be blocked no, purely for moral reasons of trying to play nice and having to be constantly attacked up to the point of giving up, if you've read my story then you be the judge of what you think, also if you know if wikipedia has a self help number to call and get this straightened out please tell me. (if you have any comments or questions, feel free to put them at the bottom and i will be sure to get back and answer them as soon as possible) The Master 2121 (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

There's no number to call but you are free to make an unblock request. WP:GAB helps you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request and I have provided specific advice, below.

--Yamla (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you i dont want to fight, as ive said i dont even know what i did wrong other than just get attacked. The Master 2121 (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

Yamla, is it references, is that what everyone keeps talking about when they say sources, like I need an outside reference to make a contribution, is that the part I'm missing?. The Master 2121 (talk) 17:18, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The core pages you need to read here are WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:RS. SO, yes, references. But only certain types of references, only references from reliable sources. For example, you can't use a fan site. --Yamla (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks, if someone had told me that in the begining then alot of stuff could have been avoided. The Master 2121 (talk) 17:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Young Justice: Outsiders. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldnt be blocked when everyone else started it, all i did was change the dates and then try to talk to a few people about it, no one listened and they kept geeting wride of my edits

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

edit warring= everyone kept changing my edits The Master 2121 (talk) 19:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not give you leave to violate WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

how did i violeteThe Master 2121 (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC) MAster2121[reply]

That edit was accurate, just look at the first half of the season The Master 2121 (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Master 2121[reply]

I tried talking about it on the talk page but no one listened, and then they just went back to changing my edits, that's some serious trollingThe Master 2121 (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

My edit was started primarliy based on the first half of the season, if anybody could have disapproved me i dared them to try.The Master 2121 (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

As has been pointed out to you, your personal observations and conclusions aren't enough to support the changes you made. It's not for anyone else to disprove your edits, it is for you to establish by the use of reliable sources that you are correct. Nthep (talk) 20:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about, this is wikipedia, anyone can edit anything anytime they want, that's Wikipedia dealThe Master 2121 (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not accurate. You are required to follow our policies and guidelines. WP:EW is one such policy you are required to adhere to. If you are at all confused about this, I'm happy to extend your block to give you more time to read our policies. --Yamla (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

policy of what,since when are there rules for wikipedia, anyone can edit anything that's what wikipedia is known for. thanks for the link but i think you should make sure the other people get it, because they started this war, and they kept going even after i learned about talk pages and tried to have a conversation with them, even thought they never listened and continued to war on me.I might be a little confused about this, i think you mean shorten my block because Im still new to this and everyone makes mistakes. but thanks anyway Yamla The Master 2121 (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Master2121

wow, your going to blame the victim, real nice. If your talking about the comment i added, that was my bad, i didn't know about talk pages, and if you saw i was willing to have a conversation with anyone who would talk, but no one did, they just kept going edit war on me to the point where i didn't even care anymore about the date, but red and some other people just wont leave me alone, and keep trolling me, my edits were just based off of the first half of the season which a lot of people will agree is not far fetched, also it was just a date i was going to take away if someone could convince me not to, but all anyone wanted to do was edit war me, i am going to sit out this block and think about whether or not I want to return to wikipedia, Id rather go back to youtube at least there the entire website dosnt attack you, i just dont know.The Master 2121 (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

With all do respect babba I don't think you understand what this is about,also I consider your argument a little biased, this block is a complete overreaction, I did not start this edit war, all I was doing was adding in something that is the truth, and everyone kept vandalising me, what was I supposed to do just sit there and let myself get pushed around, no way, wikipedia isn't that reliable, why do you think people keep making jokes about it, if it was so reliable they wouldn't make it so just anyone could edit a page, also some college professors don't even let wikipedia be used for reports as a reference because of how biased it is. Yes I know wikipedia isn't youtube, on YouTube they don't kick you off for being a free thinker who tells the truth, and they would also give you a little waring first. I don't know if I'll return because I don't know I can be on something that's consided bias and a bit of a dictatorship that dosnt even let people know if they are on charges and not even hear there side of the story first, but if I do decide to return ,I want to be helpful I just don't know if the wikipedia I thought I knew will let me The Master 2121 (talk) 03:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

I have converted the block to an indefinite block. Comments such as "since when are there rules for wikipedia" show you are not capable of editing productively yet. Any admin is free to lift the block once you convince them you have read and understood our policies and agree to abide by them. --Yamla (talk) 22:11, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How am I supposed to know the policys if you don't give them to me, also indefinite don't you think that's a little much for someone whose only been on here a few days, I mean hello I'm a newb, if you want me to do better show me don't just block me because it's easier to ignore me rather than help someone who only wanted to contribute to the fan page as a way of giving back. I also saw your talk page nad may have misjudged you but please talk to me because Im sure this is all a misunderstanding. The Master 2121 (talk) 03:37, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Master2121[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm confused on what i did wrong, as Ive said i am still new at this wikipedia thing. yes i did an edit war but it was only about defending myself and my contribution to this encyclopedia.

Decline reason:

You edit warred(click to review that policy), which is a violation of policy. Being correct is not a defense, as everyone in an edit war thinks they are correct. If others are edit warring with you, that is also not a defense, as only you can control your behavior. There are proper channels to address edit warring(such as reporting it). Please read the policy on edit warring, explain that you understand it by describing how it applies to you, tell how you will avoid edit warring in the future, and what constructive contributions you want to make if unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the policy’s, I wasn’t aware that I could report to anyone, I realized that it doesn’t excuse my actions, I just didn’t want to keep getting pushed around, I know that I should have waited the correct amount of time between to make a retraction, and then went to someone to make a complaint, I plan to avoid edit warring in the future by first going to someone page to try to talk to them and then going to the pages talk page and then going to an admin and reporting it, if unblocked I will still plan to make contributions, but not to the big pages but to the smaller pages that no one even notices, as a way for sticking up for the little guy.

Decline reason:

The problem isn't that you "should have waited the correct amount of time", the problem is that you should have discussed your changes instead of repeatedly making the same edit. Your actions on Young Justice: Outsiders were very disruptive. Your arguments here sound like you're treating this as a game or as a battleground, and not as an encyclopedia. ST47 (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fine I’m sorry but to be fair, I did try to discuss, first by putting little messages in the edit notes and then trying to make a section in the talk page, but no one ever listened or cared to review or discuss. Again I know other people’s actions don’t excuse my own. I’m not, I really am sorry, I even know now why my edit was wrong, and know what to do before I add my contributions in the future.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. See below. Huon (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1.Okay i wont ever edit war, if something happens i will report it or seek help. 2. Ive learned that lesson and I will verify my sources. 3. I understand that and will make sure to get verified sources next time. 4. I already agreed that what other people did to me does not justify my actions toward others, my part in the edit war was my fault and i accept that. I will learn from my mistakes,how was i supposed to know the warnings were real and not someone trolling me, some of those people didn't even bother to leave messages or notes, even though Im new to all of this,I only assumed they kept getting erased was because some people are so stubborn they want their way or the highway. when no one showed up right away except one guy it felt like they weren't even taking me serious, like i was just a big joke. 1. I wont Ive learned from all of this and am ready to do better for this encyclopedia. 2. I promise i wont edit any page without proper verified sources.

I want you to believe Im trust worthy, if I could go back and stop myself I would, because i never wanted anything like this to happen, and im being as honest as possible.

Decline reason:

This sounds good. But just a few hours ago there was also this edit where you took someone else's detailed explanation of why you were wrong and turned it into a blanket endorsement of your conduct in that editor's name. I'm sorry, but after such an edit I find it difficult to believe that you're trustworthy. Huon (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay,its been some time, since no one else has left a comment or a question about anything else Ive done, then i would still like to go on stating what i had before, I now know its wrong to edit war, I should have found a reliable reference to make before i made the edit, and then should have talked on the talk page on the site to see others opinions, if any problems did arise i then should have reported it, now please I just want to be unblocked and put this whole situation behind me, I am sorry, now I just want to contribute to this encyclopedia.

Accept reason:

Okay, I'll unblock. ANY repetition of edit warring or adding unsourced material is very likely to lead to you being reblocked. And don't edit other people's talk page comments. Ever. GoldenRing (talk) 14:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huon, yes I am trustworthy that edit was just made for a vote of self confidence, but i knew it wasn't real that's why i deleted it afterwards, it was just nice to feel like i made a friend on here and not someone who was coming to where i live and attacking me. The other comments i deleted were because of they were so negative and i dont want that to be the first thing i see when i check for messages, if your going to come on my talk page i would hope you respect me and type nice short and sweet things, instead i got people who aren't even involved in this dispute coming here and saying i was right to be blocked without even hearing my side of the story, the reason Im not on Facebook or twitter is because i dont want to see people telling me messed up stuff the minute i log on, that's why i made that long message explaing everything that's happened, so that people can hear my side before making a judgement. its not nice to get jumped on by a million people who dont even want to talk about whats going on. If you have anymore comments please type below. The Master 2121 (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please show where you deleted that edit? I'm pretty sure that edit still stands; that is, you haven't actually removed it. --Yamla (talk) 15:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, i guess i just deleted that persons name, but i did delete everything now, Yamla The Master 2121 (talk) 16:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked

To have any chance of being unblocked there are a number of things you have to accept and understand;

You don't edit war under any circumstances. No exceptions, no excuses exist that justify edit-warring.
Whether something is "The Truth" isn't relevant, what is relevant is that you can provide verifiable and reliable sources that support your assertion.
Your opinion or synthesis of things like episode guides to prove your point does not make that information acceptable, even if it probably or actually correct.
You have to drop the "I am the victim here" attitude and accept that your conduct so far has not been acceptable.

It's editing like yours that gets Wikipedia a bad reputation for accuracy and reliability. Yes, anyone can edit and in most cases anyone can edit any article but that freedom comes with the need to make those edits within the framework of policies that you have been given the links to. I'll give you the initial edits you made to Young Justice: Outsiders on April 15 as well-intentioned but misguided; the reason being that loads of people come on to Wikipedia with a desire to add information but without realising the need to source their changes. You weren't the first and you won't be the last to have that understanding but most learn from the subsequent experience, you don't appear to have made that step so far. I'd even go as far as to excuse your next edits to the article on April 22 for the same reason. However that's as far as it goes - after that you made 3 reversions in quick succession, on each occasion ignoring the warnings and links placed on this, your talk, page.

We then have a spate of daily addition and reversion of the same material with absolutely no attempt by you to source the information other than "prove me wrong", no attempt to discuss with anyone why they are reverting your edits and apparently no possibility crossing your mind that you might be wrong. Did it ever occur to you that the edits were being reverted for a reason?

It's only on April 30 that belatedly you start a discussion on the article talk page but instead of waiting for that discussion to finish you then continue on the cycle of adding unsourced speculation, then re-adding it when it is reverted. That leads to the block and gets us to where we are now.

If I see some satisfactory responses to the above that convince me that

you are not going to repeat the behaviour you have demonstrated so far and
you are not going to edit Young Justice: Outsiders or any other article without finding suitable sources to support your edit

then I will consider an unblock. All this comes with the warning that any repeat of your conduct so far if you are unblocked and the block will be reimposed and you'll have to convince someone else that you are trustworthy - with two indefinite blocks by that time, good luck with managing that. Nthep (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath

I was proven right, now what???

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits today are the first you've made since you were unblocked. All of them have been unconstructive. Going around adding empty section headers and ranting about how you were "proven right" like a child going yah-yah-yah are not what's expected of an editor who wants to improve the project. I've therefore indeffed you again as clearly NOTHERE and as incompetent to edit here.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Bbb23 what is your problem, i was just adding on my personal talk page, which by the way no body comes to, so why should you even care, also if you look at my history i was proven right and I'm going to say i told you to anybody that attacked me for trying to help out a show that i liked. Also your lucky i dont block you after you were vandalizing my talk page without talking to me first. -Master2121

You have access to this talk page solely so you can request an unblock. As you are not using it for that purpose, I have revoked your talk page access. This leaves you with WP:UTRS if you wish to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25920 was submitted on Jul 16, 2019 14:35:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

The Master 2121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25921 was submitted on Jul 16, 2019 15:50:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]