User talk:The Last Saxon

Thanks for the note. Sorry I missed Joefish -- now taken care of. Unfortunately, there's no way to protect your user page so that just you can edit it. I can protect it so that nobody except administrators can edit it, if you want. NawlinWiki 11:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Joseph Borgman

A tag has been placed on Joseph Borgman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny-mt^(t)_(c)I'm on editor review! 07:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Millenium Nutsack

You can't save the talk page like that, Saxon. You have to put {{hangon}} on the page. Also, the page will deleted immediately because it's orphaned talk page. Thundermaster367^{Thundermaster's Talk} 08:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Millenium Nutsack - why gone so soon? And is there anywhere I can recover it? Also, overly dank lasted a week? How did that slip past the sensors for so long? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avram Frey (talk • contribs) 20:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:I Know My Place

Template:I Know My Place has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. RichardΩ6 12 19:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 January 2. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. I'm reasonably sure you're only having a bit of fun, but it's getting a little irritating. Please note also that this edit is unacceptable: Wikipedia is neither anarchic nor democratic, but is instead built on consensus; no one on Wikipedia has any "rank" over anyone else, and no one is ever denied the right to have their say. I don't mean to bite, but I would like to ask you to be a little more serious. Happy‑melon 21:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

On your user page, you might want to do something about the "more higher" remark. It makes your english skills look questionable(unless it was done intentionally, for silliness). Anyhow, I just wanted to tell you that if you really want a place to play, follow this link: [1]. Uncyclopedia compares to Wikipedia like frat boys compare to a university's professors. Though I love Wikipedia, I occasionally have to visit Uncyclopedia to get my dose of absurdity. Good luck! SkyllaLaFey (talk) 06:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Iknowmyplace.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Iknowmyplace.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 02:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]