Thanks for uploading Image:PZ Myers.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas C. Sawyer.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages, as you did to Americans for Religious Liberty, unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. -- weirdoactort|c19:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
El Barba: I AM ON YOUR SIDE HERE. Okay? I'm trying to HELP YOU. Attacking me and violating policy and procedure isn't going to win friends and influence enemies, ya dig? -- weirdoactort|c19:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So you can keep up:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy closure, with no prejudice against an immediate trip back to AfD with a nomination by someone who actually wants the article deleted. I'm not going to comment on the bad faith, meatpuppet, and other accusations, but it's generally best to leave an AfD nomination to whoever does want an article deleted. In this case, Pan Dan indicates that he's giving the page creator(s) an opportunity to find sources, so no one seems to want the page deleted, just yet. As such, it is closed per WP:SK.--KchaseT06:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dude. Seriously. Decaf. I am no one's meat puppet; and if I were, I can guaran-damn-tee that I wouldn’t be Pan Dan’s. If you knew just how funny that accusation is to me (and would be to Pan Dan as well, I’ll wager), you’d be laughing now. Out loud. Wow. I’m honored to be part of your crazy crusade though. Incidentally; I don’t think the article should be deleted, just properly sourced. Hi! -- weirdoactort|c19:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KoS's Beard, just to make clear and expand on what I said on my talk page: I don't know whether this article should be deleted. The reason is, I don't know whether there are good sources out there. I did a cursory look, found none, and that's why I put the tags on the article. It is reasonable to think that the regular contributor/s to the article (in this case, you) are more likely to know where to find good sources than anyone else (including me). The point of the tags is not to be rude or to defile the article but to alert the contributors that they need to find sources. If you understand what I'm saying, please withdraw this nomination, because it is disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Pan Dan20:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This seems clearly to be a bad-faith nomination, although the article might be a candidate for AfD. Is there an admin around? Can this get closed?--Dmz505:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA, I advise you not to call other editors "pathetic" as you did here. This is especially relevant in this case since although Schlafly does have a tendency to POV push on creationism related matters in this case he was factually correct. JoshuaZ03:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Thomas C. Sawyer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles03:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
