Jump to content

User talk:The Haunted Angel/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

Replied

here to preserve threading. —dgiestc 17:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks …

… for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 23:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Eleven Burial Masses

uhhhh.... Don't think that I was making nonsense posts thank you. I think that you will find you are wrong. This is a new album that is due to be released by Cradle of Filth...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Eleven-Burial-Masses-Cradle-Filth/dp/B000NOKF8U/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/026-5631576-8287607?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1176479974&sr=8-1

also here

http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=7404876&cart=520597383&BAB=M

another link showing the new album

http://www.starpulse.com/Music/Cradle_Of_Filth/Discography/album/P200252/R1041219/

Note that Disc 1 has 13 tracks and disc 2 as 11 tracks and is due to be released on 23rd April 2007.

So can you put the page back please?

Dukeicon (talk 16:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

I am still very confused as to the album itself - all the tracks, as well as the title "Eleven Burial Masses" comes from the Cradle DVD Heavy, Left-Handed and Candid. The track order is an exact copy of the said DVD. Although I cannot argue that it's odd all these online shops are advertising it, what is odd is that firstly, they have no pictures of it (still, that is somewhat understandable) but that there has been no mention of it outside of these shops, such as by the band. The Cradle website makes no mention of it, neither does any magazine I have read recently - not to mention the fact they have only recently released Peace Through Superior Firepower, their latest live release. At best, my guess is that they are re-releasing Heavy, Left Handed and Candid - but that doesn't explain why it's only the live concert and not the second DVD; I'll keep my eyes out. ≈ The Haunted Angel 16:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


As i said as well. The second disc does have extra tracks on it.

I have found an image for it on play.com http://www.play.com/Music/CD/GENCS/16/40/-/3339939/Eleven_Burial_Masses/Product.html?searchtype=genre and http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/Cradle_of_Filth/Eleven_Burial_Masses_-cd+dvd/20007/ and http://eil.com/shop/moreinfo.asp?catalogid=398076


These sites have got more information on it. Looks like its a didgi pack http://chaos.com/product.asp?intProductID=1469852&intArtistID=687 and some more info here http://eil.com/shop/extsearch.asp?disctitle=eleven-burial-masses

Dukeicon 18:14, 13 April 2007 (GMT).

Now that is interesting. Well, first off, you have my greatest apologies for accusing you of making a nonsense article - there is substantial proof outside of the Cradle site that such a release is going to be made... but, I still can't understand what this CD will contain - is it just a re-release of Heavy, Left-Handed and Candid? I'll ask Cardinal Wurzel what he thinks - he is about as involved with the Cradle pages as me, if not more, so he'll be the best person to discuss this with. Again, greatest apologies for accusing you - you seem to have enough proof backing you up! ≈ The Haunted Angel 17:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Howdo. My guess is that this is an American release. Live Bait for the Dead and Heavy, Left Handed and Candid were both released independently in the UK through Abracadaver - Cradle's own little label. I'd guess that America never saw either of them, since Cradle's distribution seems to be by various different labels in different countries - and that Eleven Burial Masses is just a US release of the two together under a different name. Even the artwork is from the Heavy, Left handed... booklet. So I'd list it in the discography under "miscellaneous releases" as an American re-release and re-packaging of the original album and DVD. Cardinal Wurzel 17:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

A fair enough assumption - looks like that's the way it's going; I noticed the artwork looked familiar, now I realise it is indeed from Heavy, Left-Handed... Well, I'll get onto updating that, cheers dude ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 18:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the apology. People make mistakes. Glad that this has been sorted. More information may come out closer the the US release of it. Thanks for that Link, I just read it as I was replying to you!! Dukeicon 19:17, 13 April 2007 (GMT)


the first Latino your gonna meet

whao whao whao take it easy when you talk to me ok! what do you think this is anyway the nazi party well anyway meng i didnt vandlize OK i only talk to to him so take it easy OK and dont be bring in some demon junk on me talk to me easy ok like a angel not some falling thing ok!

... what!? ≈ The Haunted Angel 13:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


hahaha >_< just what i thought--Butterrum 03:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Who the fuck are you!? Stay the fuck away from me!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.233.141 (talk • contribs)

No, if you wish to vandalise articles or insult people, then it is my responsibility to warn you and report you should it continue. ≈ The Haunted Angel 16:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant no disrespect.

Helbrecht, are you referring to the current High Marshal of the Black Templars? The guy named Halbrecht could be another person because the Horus Heresy happened 10,000 years before High Marshal Helbrecht's time.

Well Its not important. I meant no disrespect and sincerely I apologize. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.199.186.179 (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC).

Don't worry, not disrespect is taken, trying to sort such things out is what we are here for! Ok, here's how I see it - keep in mind that Space Marines live a very long time, I mean, Abaddon the Despoiler is in both the Horus Heresy series as well as the 40K game, as the Space Marine body is so well made, it is unknown how long they can actually live for (the originals at least, Garro was alive before Mortarion was even a part of the Imperium). And, considering that the Black Templars are an Imperial Fists successor chapter, it would make perfect sense if Helbrecht were once an Imperial Fists captain, so that when the day came that Robute Guilliman decided to split the Legions into Chapters, Rogal Dorn could have ordered Helbrecht in charge of the Black Templar Chapter. That's how I see it anyway - again, don't worry about angering or offending me, talking stuff through like this is the best way to come to a logical conclusion ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 11:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding. Vandalism is also a big thing for me. So I really felt bad when I vandalized your entry.

Well Rogal Dorn assigned Sigismund (not Helbrecht) as the first high marshal (chapter master) of the Black Templars when the Imperial Fists Legion was divided. Also in page 44 of the Black Templar Codex, it states that Helbrecht was elected High Marshal in 989.M41 following the subjugation of the Xenarchs of the Sigilare Nebula and after High Marshal Kordhel was slain. Furthermore, he served under Marshal Daidin's Crusade. Based on these, High Marshal Helbrecht was not the overall leader of the Black Templars prior to 989.M41 (Horus Heresy occurred in 200.M30). Therefore the guy Halbracht from the book and Helbrecht are two different individuals.

The reason why Abaddon is still alive after 10,000 years is because he lives in the Eye of Terror, which is exposed to the warp. Time in the warp works slowly. This is why Chaos Space Marines have more battle experience than Space Marines becuase most of them have been around for 10,000 years. Loyal Space Marines usually don't survive for over a millennia, (the oldest living space marine that I know of, aside those who reside the dreadnought, is Commander Dante of the Blood Angels who is only 1,200 years old).

I hope these information could help you. More power to you.

Hmm, ok, let's firstly discuss the age thing. I realise that Abaddon's slow aging may be the result of the Eye of Terror's defiance of physical laws, but it is a fact that Space Marines age very slowly, if at all. I'm sure it states somewhere in Eisenstein that it's actually unknown if they do age (I may be thinking of just the Primarchs here). Also, remember it does state that Garro has been in the Death Guard Legion so long, he was there when the Emperor first found Mortarion on Barbarus, back then the Death Guard were called the "Dusk Raiders". Not to mention the fact that aside from the Primarchs, Qruze is the oldest Space Marine in the whole Horus Heresy series (I think that one was explained back in Horus Rising. Due to the Emperor's discovered ability that he can prevent his own aging, it would appear that the Space Marines inherited their father's ability to do such. This would also explain Dante's age. If this is true, then it's possible that Helbrecht (or Halbrecht) was not the High Marshall of the Black Templars until the date you specified above - but he was still alive until that point. ≈ The Haunted Angel 13:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

But many loyal space marine during the Horus Heresy are dead. Let's say Helbrecht was around during the Heresy, he would be considered a very special individual by his peers because he had the honor of living through the time when the Emperor was still walking among the living and being elected as high marshal in the 41st millenium (after 10,000 years of serving the Emperor) would be highly improbable. Therefore, I think Helbrecht was not around during the heresy. An example of an individual who was around during the Horus Heresy is the venerable dreadnought Bjorn the Fell-Handed of the Space Wolves. He is believed to be the only surviving (aside from the missing and on stasis Primarchs) space marine who fought during the Heresy in the 41st millennium and he has a special place in his chapter because of this feat. If Helbrecht was in fact like Bjorn, this fluff would be known in the Warhammer 40K gaming community. But alas, there's no info that Helbrecht did indeed was around the heresy. And as far as I know, only Bjorn has that honor, that Helbrecht and Halbrecht are two people therefore is not a inconsistency. But your're propably right too. The best thing we can do is probably do research and ask people around (like in 40k forums - Librarium Online, 40k Online or Warseer) about this. Anyways I've included some stuff about the life of Bjorn if you're interested:

http://www.librarium-online.com/?c=123&a=1104

I also started a topic in Librarium Online about this. Feel free to check it out.

http://www.librarium-online.com/forums/showthread.php?p=909004#post909004


Thanks. Have nice day.

You actually have a very good point - ok, here's what I'll do: I'll remove the thing I put in the Eisenstein article, and commend you for your brilliant knowledge of 40K. If you had an account I'd probably throw a barnstar at you, for you raise very good points, and it looks like you really know your stuff (more then me, and I'm trying to get a job at the damn place!), so I'd say both your knowledge of 40K and your ability to discuss and argue it out is great. Lol, as a Wikipedian, it's probably my duty now to urge you to get an account. Thanks for the discussion ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 00:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I can't recall which one it was, but an old Space Marine Codex (or another source book - I seem to think about the Rogue Trader time) mentions that SM live for hundreds of years if not killed. I think the oldest known living SM at the moment is Dante, at about 1000 years or so. Darkson - BANG! 22:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Ooh, Rogue Trader time? That's way before my day in 40K. I dunno if that's been retconned at all, but I removed the thing that I put on the Eisenstein, although I might add something about it being a similar name, ≈ The Haunted Angel 22:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

i read the book you told me to read it was about a old man he wanted money so he went on a boat and sail and sailed he found big fish he caught big fish and he sailed and sailed back but shark eat the fish and he no get no money......--Butterrum 02:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

... I'm sorry, I can't recall what book I told you to read... ≈ The Haunted Angel 08:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I believe it was "Old Man and the Sea." :) SanchiTachi 15:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I think you may have the wrong person, I can't remember telling you to read a book I've never heard of =/ ≈ The Haunted Angel 16:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Si you also told me to right a ese. So I wrote to my ese in Puerto Rico and he wrote back this is what it says. Thank you for writing me a letter your ese Jaun I wrote to my other ese but they no write back yet.--Tommy Montana 03:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

... I honestly have no idea what you are on about. Could you not provide a link to this? ≈ The Haunted Angel 08:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

No link just big fiish and ese you want my letter?--Tommy Montana 17:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok I'm gonna' have to stop you right now. I havn't a clue what you are on about, and I suspect heavilly you are either speaking to the wrong person, or.. well I don't have another choice. If you can't in all honesty give me a link that proves I said it, I suspect that you need to try and find the right person ≈ The Haunted Angel 17:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi There

I've noticed you lately.

I had an old account, but I had to remake it (I forgot how I spelt it, so I just decided to make a new one), because I was tired of editing the Warhammer pages without an account name. Regardless, I've been trying to clean up grammar, cite sources, fix pages, and organize them in general. It seems that a lot of people just didn't give a damn, or would rather put in unsourced speculation instead of actually getting off their butts and finding the actual canon.

Regardless, I think that we should probably pool our efforts. Many of the Warhammer (40,000) pages tend to vary in many ways from each other and a lot are still lacking. Regardless, Hi. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SanchiTachi (talk • contribs) 15:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC).

Hey there! Glad to be working with you on 40K pages - the best chance for us to "pool our resources" is here, the 40K WikiProject, and where we can work with other such users. I look forward to seeing you there ^_^

Chico help me!

Please help me i'm having problems with a certain user nammed Klyptzm! He keeps calling me a sockpuppet, This Butterrum guy and Vandlized my page and dleated my warning tamplets. Please help chica like I helped you read that book and write to my ese!--Tommy Montana 05:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Again dude, you have the wrong person. If you are having trouble with another user, see an Admin. ≈ The Haunted Angel 09:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

No you are the Girl I helped when you asked me to read that book about the fiish. and write the ese and you are a admin right?--Tommy Montana ~The World Chico and everything in it~ 18:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

-Sigh- I'm not a girl, not an admin, and not the person who told you to read a book -_- ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Conjo meng sorry I didn't know!! But I did help you read a book in return you help me Chico!--Tommy Montana ~The World Chico and everything in it~ 21:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Your page is SO funny! How do you attract these people?! Just lucky, I guess. :D Cardinal Wurzel 14:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Seriously dude, I havn't a clue. I think I'm just gonna' give up on certain useless things... like the discussion above =/ ≈ The Haunted Angel 14:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Signature

How do you change the colour and talk page link in your signature? (I love the cradle bit on the end btw ;p). Maurauth 12:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Hehe thanks, I thought it was very fitting, but I've since changed it. Anyway, in order to change it, find how you want your sig to appear on Wikipedia, as in find the code (check out the code for my old one or my new one as an example) then go to "My Preferences", and add the code into the "Signature" box. ≈ The Haunted Angel 13:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all that :D Maurauth (...) 08:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
My pleasure ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 11:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

The Number 23

Regarding you removing the various trivia entries based on them being irrelevant or original research... I can understand if the trivia doesn't belong there, such as the Lost reference. But to remove the numerology stuff on the basis that it's original research seems somewhat silly, to me. They're numbers. No one can argue that what I'm saying isn't true, because it is. The original research rule is to stop people from adding things that my not necessarily be from a good source. I can certainly find a site that states fairly clearly how simple mathematics works, and I can also get someone to check if the math I used works out properly. At some point, there must have been someone else who added the numbers that I did together and got the same answer (though not necessarily for the same reason). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Missle-aneous (talk • contribs)

There's a lot of reasons I removed what I did. Firstly, I'll say that Trivia sections are encouraged to be broken down and moved into other sections of the article. More importantatly, some of the stuff I removed I did so because it was a huge guess at trying to link some pattern to the film. Some stuff was irrelevant, the only reason it was there was because it had the Number 23 in it, that had nothing to do with the film, and has a better place on the 23 Enigma article, or whatever it's called. I left the stuff that I felt had somewhat a conncection to the film, such as how certain patterns within the film add up to 23, but some stuff was jumping the gun quite a bit. I'll say now, anything that coincedentally relates to 23, but not the film, will be removed from the article immediatly. Even in-film coincidences I would prefer is someone created their own section for, which I will probably end up doing. 23-related patterns don't have much to do with the film, more the enigma - this is an encyclopedic aritcle, remember. There have been some insane conincidences drawn which I thought was quite silly to add the article in the first place. All in all, the Trivia section needs removing, and anything which, after it has been split up, isn't relevant in any other section, will be also removed. ≈ The Haunted Angel 00:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Robert Anton Wilson wrote extensively on 23 See his book "Cosmic Trigger" he relates it to the dog star sirius mainly but he talks about it in other ways as well.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 21:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

And any such stuff should be mentioned in either his article, his book, or, if it's relating to the 23 Enigma, that article. What I'm trying to do is keep crap out of the aritcle about the film, The Number 23. ≈ The Haunted Angel 22:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I just want to say 2 divided by 3 is not .666. Its something like 333/5something put it in a calculator. 2 divided by 3 is .66666666666666666666666666666666666666666 and so on.User:Bloodsource

I know, but the actual quote says ".666", and we have to post the actual quote (if that's even there anymore), as opposed to what it actually is. ≈ The Haunted Angel 21:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

CoF Tours

I don't see why a list of their tours wouldn't be appropriate, it tracks what they were doing whilst not writing songs, and shows who they've performed with. Maurauth (talktome)(wha?) 14:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

What I mean is, that there is not much point in just listing each tour that they've done when they've done it and who with - it's not really that encyclopedic; besides, they tour frequently, and if you listed one, you'd have to list them all. ≈ The Haunted Angel 08:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Please Help me change

Hello, a while ago I added a section to the "Outsider" part of the "C'tan" page. You removed this section (which can be seen at [1]), I realise that this was fully justified, you also told me how to make it acceptable, by re-writing it in an encyclopedic and NPOV style. Please could you explain how to do this, so that I can correct it. Discdeath 15:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

So should I just write that in the text, or is there something else I should do with it??? Discdeath 17:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
The source is this [2] page. Thanks, Discdeath 15:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Just a question, i got a message sent to my I.P, iP addresses can be shared by more than one user, can paticlar IP addresses be banned?

If an IP is shared by more then one person, it can still be banned in order to prevent vandals on the IP from vandalising (such as School IP's). The way to get around this is simply to create an account, that way messages sent to the IP won't bother you, if you do not vandalise. ≈ The Haunted Angel 08:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

AIV

Hello, when reporting users to WP:AIV please add new requests at the bottom of the page, below the existing requests so the ones that have been their the longest and possibly more urgent can be dealt with first. Thank you and happy editing! The Sunshine Man 20:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Dani

The other picture seems to be a bit suspect, it's on many other sites and looks like a professional photoshoot, and I doubt that means that someone who owns it will just upload it to wiki. ≈ Maurauth (talktome)(wha?) 00:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm only putting this one since it's a quick solution, I mean if we're using a fair use image for his article so that you can see his face better, we should use a better looking picture than that old one since looks freaky in it ;p ≈ Maurauth (talktome)(wha?) 11:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Well I've looked through all the fair use rules, and there's a better picture of him, since it's low resolution but still looks better than that purple backgrounded one since it's not stretched. DaniFilthFairUse.jpg I checked it against all the fair use rules, and it's more encyclopedic as you say. ≈ Maurauth (talktome)(wha?) 12:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Massey Drive, Newfoundland

I noticed that you tagged Massey Drive, Newfoundland. In general, articles about towns and cities are always considered notable. --Eastmain 01:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

isn't he nice.

Hey I just saw that you had wroten Mr. Sunshine isn't he really nice. --Abubblegum 16:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

HeyDropempty

Would you agree it would be more productive of you to acquire citations for the Coheed and Cambria mess of a wiki than to worry about the vanity of your personal talk page?

At least let those of us who know something about music alter the page and clear up some of the misinformation on it.

Do your job!

User indefinitely blocked. Good times. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Lol, thanks dude. Seriously, the idiocy of some people... ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Not a problem. Someone starting their editing by screwing with someone's talk page is suspect enough (doubly so because of it being yours; you're a magnet for idiots, it seems), but the user also had some real gems in his contributions. Not difficult to see where that one was going... EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Lol, it does seem that he had a fantastic frame of thought for editing Wikipedia! ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

help

please email me back at this addresse kylie@nbnet.nb.ca to discuss my articale jennifer kent author —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovetoread202 (talk • contribs)

Email isn't necessary - if you wish to talk about it, here or the article's talk page will suffice. ≈ The Haunted Angel 21:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

I, Spebi, award you this barnstar for your tireless reverting on Dani Filth's article and other articles that you edit that I watch :) –Spebi 00:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much, good sir! ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 00:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
No problem :) ~Spebi 00:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

RE: warning

you accuse me of vandalism when i wrote something that was LESS stupid than the rest of the article.

if you love untermensch metal bands like cradle of filth, you need to understand they were always a product aimed to sell to someone, the same as dimmu borgir after stormblast. furthermore, you failed to notice the still present vandalism/POV statement that preceded my edited text, the moronity of which spurred me to create.You need a crash course in metal philosophy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.153.51.253 (talk) 21:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC).

The philosophy of "not negotiating with terrorists" comes to mind. After re-checking your additions to both Dani Filth's article and the blatant POV in Martin Powell, I am simply going to ignore your quest to prove a point (your point, no one else's) and simply ask you to either make edits which actually contribute to Wikipedia, or to just not edit any more. ≈ The Haunted Angel 21:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

This is why Wikipedia is terrible. Moron bored 15 year old philistines like you turning this into a popularity contest "(your point, no one else's)". Keep glowingly editing your Papa Roach and Cradle of Filth articles so you have something to be a part of! It would be terrible to say (objectively, mind you) your taste in music is terrible, right?

Firstly, I'm 18 and I live in England - Papa Roach isn't an article I frequently edit, and this isn't a popularity contest - it is an attempt to keep POV (that you seem to excrete) separated from factual information. If you think Wikipedia is terrible, then by all means, don't come back. ≈ The Haunted Angel 22:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Do you even know what philistine means? Do you also know how you manage to subconcsiously imbue articles with your own puerile fancies and POV? The 'facts' here are only decided by popularity, so saying Cradle of Filth made a product out of music from the start and so never sold out in the first place is wrong because it offends their fans (you).

As it can relate to either the opposite of intelect or where a person originates, I thought I'd clear both up. But, onto a relevant subject, you are honestly telling me that saying that "unfortunately the people who accuse Cradle of Filth of selling out don't realise they were doing it from the very start" is less POV then just leaving the article as it is? ≈ The Haunted Angel 23:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

The opposite of intellect? Still wrong I am afraid.

Close enough, or rather, deciding not to pursue it. Either way, your getting off topic. If now all your purpose is to try and argue with me with no subject behind it, I ask you to stop before you get banned. If you ever decide that you want to discuss something relevant, do reply. Otherwise, keep in mind that you are on your final warning, and wasting time with nothing but argument for the sake of it will give you a ban. ≈ The Haunted Angel 17:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Missing Userboxes?

Sinagogue of Satan and The Liber of the Goat

Hey, you seem to understand what the deal is with the relavent policies. I'm going to try to take a less aggressive role in these topics because I don't want Margolin to be under the impression that I'm "going after him". He seems pretty intent on making this a personal issue which, while unfortunate, is also understandable. I'm sure he feels like I'm singling him out and that's not the way I want this to be. If you could help out and try to make him understand that could do alot to avoid future nastyness. Thanks man. NeoFreak 02:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

You can't say LaVey is stupid, Mr. Anon, simply because the word "Satan" is used and yet it isn't devil worship. As Margolin will tell you, Satanism no longer means Devil Worship, and represents freedom. ≈ The Haunted Angel 09:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC) I would have answered the way you said I would answer, but censorship pulled the plug. As you can see there is always a way to answer a question but as far as truth and real that is like beauty, up to the beholder like heavy metal, unpluged lol I would have corrected you though, in all honesty Satanism has always been about freedom, it was just given a bad name by those that wished to exploit that freedom.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 04:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey!

You stole my sig :) >Radiant< 14:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

MKA

Armageddon for the Wii has not been released in the US. Why do you undo my edits? Allemannster 20:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I did not notice that the article said that. I was trying to revert the article to a previous version with the correct Wii release date. I intended no vandalism and did not know it was on the page. Allemannster 20:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Speaking of the release date, I've confirmed from multiple game sites and message boards that it will come out for Wii on the 29th of May. This editing war needs to stop. What can be done? Allemannster 21:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

This guy doesn't know how to use the talk page apparently. He's making what I consider threats and/or personal attacks and apparently has a history of it. He's also editing it without signing in to cover his tracks. Just thought I'd let you know.Allemannster 21:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If you've got an alternate source, I'd suggest using it; one of the objections appears to be that it's IGN. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
True, although I can't see the problem with IGN myself - that alone should be enough, should it not? ≈ The Haunted Angel 22:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I've added several to the talk page. That many sites can't be wrong. Allemannster 22:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Should I keep undoing it or do you want to take care of it? Thanks for all you've done :) Allemannster 22:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I just corrected it again. I guess he/she is back at it :( Allemannster 03:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Saw that the edit warring is trying to continue. He/she is clearly vandalizing and therefore won't talk it out on the Talk Page. Allemannster 02:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

No argument here

I guess the more visible it is, the better! Cardinal Wurzel 17:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Cradle of Filth vandal

User:Madeleinemccann and User:Mrgiggles0 are both accounts which have vandalised the article, and both have been created solely for vandalism. I believe they're one and the same; do you know an admin that can take action? LuciferMorgan 15:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I've reported them to ANI. LuciferMorgan 16:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Ok cool. The user seems to deliberately target certain articles anyway. LuciferMorgan 16:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


You offend me!

With your Pentagrams and Demons! In my country this is VERY offensive! Also I had to tell Sean a quick message so I'm just telling you before I talk to him ok!--Manny Ribera 16:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

You should know that the Pentagram is an ancient symbol, and is not a Devil-worshipping symbol, not to mention being as Religious as any other symbol (such as the Star of David or the Crucifix), but hell, I won't get onto that now. Either way, as much as we are all trying to help the situation, Klptyzm made the right point in saying how we should avoid posting on his talk page unless it's necessary, such as dispensing a warning or two. ≈ The Haunted Angel 16:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Hes unblocked though...So I think it's ledgit to talk to him? Right?--Manny Ribera 14:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

As long as it's not antagonising him or provoking him to start off again, yeah. ≈ The Haunted Angel 15:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok then I was wondering that part!--Manny Ribera 16:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

ClockCrew

Yep, he is already blocked. Thanks for the help! —Ocatecir Talk 18:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:C&C logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:C&C logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 01:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Your AIV report

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Anas talk? 17:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Again, vandals must receive a recent final warning before being reported to AIV. 81.145.240.120 did not receive one. —Anas talk? 17:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Um

What are you talking about? All I do is read wikipedia, I never have anything to add.

Here is a list of your contributions that you have made to Wikipedia - I was reffering to the Dani Filth comment. If you honestly did not make those comments, then it is likely that you are using a shared IP address, and it was someone else either on your computer, or another computer using the same IP. If you did not make the edit, then please ignore the warning :) Thanks ≈ The Haunted Angel 10:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Haunted_Angel/Archive_4&oldid=1139339663"