User talk:The Grudges

April 2017

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2012–16) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian Civil War

In the process of your reverting due to to WP:DRNC you appear to have accidentally reverted the two edits I made directly before you. It should be noted that the page is under 1-revert rule, and an administrator might see it and think you intentionally violated it by reverting my editions. If you can please restore them that would be great. LylaSand (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions notice

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Your current practice of following around a particular editor and reverting them across a wide range of articles is unacceptable, and it will result in a very swift topic ban if it continues. I've reverted the edits due to their harassing nature. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:BU Rob13, how add to see this editor come out of nowhere and start hitting it hard in a troubled area. This is a returning user. Drmies (talk) 01:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]