User talk:The Grot

Welcome, from Journalist

Welcome!

Hello, The Grot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

^{Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}

Ten German Bombers
[edit]

Thank you for adding citations to Ten German Bombers; however, as far as I can tell, neither The Times nor spiked appear to connect that particular song with the German provisions commonly associated with Nazist propaganda (e. g. §86, §86a and §130 StGB and others) and the Home Office’s press release does not mention any songs. Unless I am overlooking something, the citations in the article do not support the article’s description of the Home Secretary’s statements, which does not make much sense on its own, either. Therefore, I suggest deleting the relevant paragraph from ‘as it might be construed…’ on, unless it can be backed up with more citations. —xyzzy_n 11:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

done. The Grot 12:33, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ten German Bombers
[edit]

Hi Grot,
I don't exactly understand why you removed the information about the song by Egotronic from the article Ten German Bombers. The information itself is definately relevant and deserves to be included. If what disturbed you is that the source for the statement is from a German-language newspaper, then you should have asked for another source or tried to find one yourself. But removing the statement alltogether wasn't really necessary. But if you'll read what Wikipedia considers a reliable source before removing statements based on what sources are cited, you'll read that "foreign-language sources are acceptable in terms of verifiability, subject to the same criteria as English-language sources". That means that the statement and the source can stay. If you could find an English-language source that would of course be better, but until you do that source will have to stay.
--Carabinieri^T_T^a_a^l_l^k_k 09:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll answer this on Talk:Ten_German_Bombers were other people can join in if they wish. The Grot 14:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Untagged image
[edit]
An image you uploaded, Image:Rws.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 17:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)}