User talk:The Greek Historian 1204

The Greek Historian 1204, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The Greek Historian 1204! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Józef Piłsudski, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Jets100 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 20:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Greek Historian 1204 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no connection with the account Jets100. This is the only account I have on Wikipedia. Please unblock the account.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts, Jets100 or otherwise. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Greek Historian 1204 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no connection with the account Jets100. This is the only account I have on Wikipedia. I do not have multiple accounts. Please stop with these ridiculous accusations. I demand an end to the investigation of multiple accounts. Please remove all of the other accounts that may be associated with Jets100. I am ashamed at the Wikipedia administrators for regulating freedom of speech. I will continue to ask for an unblock.

Decline reason:

Freedom of speech doesn't exist on Wikipedia, as we're not a country; we're an encyclopedia (see WP:NOTFREESPEECH). And this account has been confirmed by a checkuser to be a sock of Jets100... so you just saying it's not, doesn't make it so. I'm also revoking your talk page access, so you won't be making any more of these disruptive requests. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.