User talk:The Good Dante
Jenkins
[edit]Okay, you beat me to it. Woulda helped. Best regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 00:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
A barn star for you
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| I thought that you might be somewhat discouraged after putting a great deal of work in recently. So I did want to encourage you to continue editing; to edit widely; and to continue your efforts to improve the Encyclopedia. I know it’s tough when something we think should be there turns out to cut across policy – we have all been there! But I’m impressed by your diligence and willingness to WP:AGF and engage in friendly and constructive discussion. So a barn star and some WP:wikilove for you! Springnuts (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC) |
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:BarehamOliver per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BarehamOliver. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:BarehamOliver per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BarehamOliver. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Nomination of Chris Clark (writer) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Clark (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.