User talk:The Friendly Sock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Friendly Sock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Who the hell is DegenFarang??? I suggest you run a CU - you'll notice I have no connection to any other user

Decline reason:

Given that you clearly are familiar with the functioning of Wikipedia, give us a really convincing reason for choosing a username which you must have known would raise suspicion.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:21, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Run a CU, it's not me. It's really unfair if you guys start blocking people you think are me based on one action. Few ducks quack that clearly. (I knew about this because of an email after they edited my talk page) --Handpolk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C06E:EDC0:A19E:8A1B:14FA:9A59 (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checkusers do not run "clear my name" checks on the basis that those requesting them already know that the results will come back negative - because they've reset their router or moved location. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then run some other check because this dude is being blocked for being me and he isn't me. 172.56.6.145 (talk) 08:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Friendly Sock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not at all familiar with the functioning of wikipedia - I just created this account as I noticed how unfair the block of Handpolk seemed, and wanted to restore their unblock request. I'm absolutely nothing to do with them! Honest!!!

Decline reason:

Who do you think we are? Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. Max Semenik (talk) 13:48, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think I realized what's going on. This is a troll pretending to be me, pretending to not be me. It really wasn't me, though. H. 2602:30A:C06E:EDC0:F1D7:1D4E:3322:141F (talk) 00:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]