User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2011/May

Conspiracy theory

If Lia Looveer is important, this may be the reason.

• The 1975 Australian "constitutional crisis" that ousted Gough Whitlam was in fact a military coup d'état. If Whitlam had not resigned, the military would have escorted him out.
• The decision to oust Whitlam was done outside Australia, in the Western Intelligence community. The driving forces were the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations and the World Anti-Communist League.
• The reason for the coup was Whitlam's explicit recognition of the governments of Soviet Estonia and the Baltic Soviet republics.
• The person who set the wheels in motion was Lia Looveer.

The only proof I have for this, apart from my telepathic link to the leading intelligence organizations, is the fact the Whitlam called Looveer before he announced the decision – as if he had to ask her permission. Evidently the phone call did not go well. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

P.S – The funny thing here is that maybe Whitlam never knew what hit him. Well, Lia did – and told all her nationalist like minded friends. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Interesting theory, but news to me. Anyway, we seem to be making some progress. I appreciate the declaration you added to your statement. The only question I have is whether you understand that using a book about someone else which only mentions the association of a subject with a collaborator as a source is not appropriate. I have no interest in suppressing well-sourced information about actual Nazi's or collaborators such as Georg Leibbrandt, a Black Sea German, where I have a family history, but every person who met with him or associated with him after he was denazified should not be linked to Leibbrandt's Nazi history. User:Fred Bauder Talk 17:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Family Compact -- Current Status

Hi there: My period of Canadian political history competence is 1812-1867; so if you want to fill in the current names etc, I would really appreciate that. It would give the article good shape. I think my point in expanding this article is to identify the notable members of the Family Compact, with whom very few Ontarians (let alone Canadians) are familiar. That, and balancing the "evil oligarchy" with "families working the interests of each other." Thanks for looking in on the article. CJ_WeißSchäfer (talk) 01:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Burkie Barnstar
		For your many efforts to improve articles on Conservatism-related articles, I give you the Edmund Burke Barnstar. Keep up the good work.  Will Beback  talk  04:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

do you or Will consider yourself conservative? Darkstar1st (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement decision

Enforcement by indefinite ban of User:Vecrumba is declined. User:The Four Deuces is banned indefinitely from editing articles which relate to minority peoples of the Soviet Union due to repeated violations of the warning in Section 8 of the decision Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Vecrumba. Appeal is to the Arbitration Committee. User:Fred Bauder Talk 00:08, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

This ban is lifted as the result of your appeal at AE. You are urged to heed the warnings about disruptive editing stated by a number of admins in the Result section of the appeal. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks-

Just wanted to say thanks, TFD, for filing the sock puppet investigation and following up on it. V7-sport (talk) 01:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Re. nothing in particular...even if not always in agreement I respect the way that you reason your positions out and admire the temperament that you present them.V7-sport (talk) 02:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

LOL, best news I've had all week month. :-)V7-sport (talk) 19:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello, The Four Deuces. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BLP policy change discussion

Hi, TFD. As I recall, your interests are mostly political, but also veer into political biography. If that's correct, there are a few proposals currently at the talk page for WP:BLP that may be of considerable interest. If you'd like to reply, you can do so here, since I've temporarily watchlisted this page. Cheers,  – OhioStandard (talk) 22:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

1953 coup

I'm notifying contributors to the 1953 Iranian coup article about a proposed change in the article posted on the talk page, that adds information about events leading up to the coup. Only a couple of comments so far. Am planning to request comments WP:RfC later. --BoogaLouie (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)