User talk:The Coalition Network

Indeed, I need to know where to obtain the approriate knowledge in which I would be able to submit information amongst this website's guidelines. I want to be able to submit information for Wikipedia's use in addition to the general knowledge globally through this website. Please advise me as to how that can be done. If the information is submitted to either you or another administrator at that point can it be added to the encyclopedia. The information attached to this page is valid. Any guideline violations were a direct result of lacking knowledge to guideline issues. Please advise me how I can appropriately submit this information to be available for those who look to retreive it.

As I've said, you're free to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia (without advertising The Coalition Network) after reviewing our policies and guidelines. There is not really a situation in which it would be advisable to edit information regarding The Coalition Network, due to your conflict of interest. If someone else decides to write an article about The Coalition Network, perhaps your comments and suggestions would be welcome. Leebo ^T/C 22:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there alternative methods of submitting information to Wikipedia?

I would like for this account to be unblocked. I have now obtained the appropriate knowledge. In addition, can new information that is not available on wikipedia be added as per user name? For instance, if references are available on the world wide web from major corporations, etc? Is the username section only for editing current information or can new information be added?

Also, Wikipedia is a website to obtain the appropriate knowledge. How is it that new valid information is being rejected based on the assumption of promotion? How is it that this free encyclopedia can deny information be submitted? The website is also preventing knowledge from being obtained.

Wikipedia is not quite what you're describing it as. It's an encyclopedia, and as such it is neutral. If you are closely related to a subject, you have a conflict of interest in editing articles related to that subject, meaning the goal of Wikipedia as a neutral encyclopedia and your personal interests conflict. Leebo ^T/C 20:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username blocked

Your username has been blocked indefinitely, because it is self-promotional and the account was being used for advertising on User:The Coalition Network. Your user page has subsequently been deleted under criterion for speedy deletion G11 - blatant advertising. Please note in the future that Wikipedia is not a place to advertise. You may create another account, as long as it is not used for advertorial purposes. Leebo ^T/C 14:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Coalition Network (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I am requesting an appeal of this page in which has been blocked. The information provided is valid and does not extensively promote anyone or thing. The organization is non-profit and professional. I am inquiring as to why this information cannot be submitted accordingly. Please arrange for another administrator to review the page & I propose that this username be unblocked. Please get back to me regarding this matter. Hope all is well. In addition, I am under the assumption that new valid information can be added to this free encylopedia website. If the references are available as per the world wide web then what is the problem? Thank You,

Decline reason:

Please see WP:COI, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is not to be used for marketing. — Yamla 20:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you wish to have this block reviewed, you may use the {{unblock}} template by placing {{unblock|YOUR REASON HERE}} on this page. Another administrator will review your request. Leebo ^T/C 20:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]