User talk:The Cat Kingdom

Welcome!

Hello, The Cat Kingdom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Cat communication. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! IAKenny (talk) 01:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock on 18 March 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Cat Kingdom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I, SlitherioFan2016, have reviewed every single policy on Wikipedia thoroughly.
I now completely understand what edit warring is.
I now completely understand why I am currently blocked, and I will not attempt to change the color scheme at comparison tables again.
If unblocked, what I would like to do is to stick to minor edits and start off by correcting all the grammatical errors at the article List of Pororo the Little Penguin characters.
Please unblock my original account so that I can have another chance to be useful on the English Wikipedia.
I really do promise not to edit war ever again.
I did edit as User:Mali1702 as well as all the other accounts in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of SlitherioFan2016 and Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SlitherioFan2016. I did not, and I mean DID NOT, edit as the 108.* IP's.
I did hear User:FisherQueen once saying that seeking forgiveness is especially difficult for sockpuppeteers because the act of sockpuppetry is perceived as dishonest, even if the sockpuppeteer in question is not inherently malevolent. However, she did not say that sockpuppeteers are never unblocked. Rather, she said that sockpuppeteers are rarely unblocked.
Please stop questioning me. I am NOT an evil vandal. I am a genuinely good-hearted person who wants to improve and be pardoned. --SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you wanted to demonstrate how you understand our policies by creating more socks, you achieved the opposite. Max Semenik (talk) 13:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to make this request from SlitherioFan2016 (talk · contribs) rather than here - requests from puppet accounts will not be honored. —DoRD (talk) 12:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and as I just found Cat and Kitten Lover (talk · contribs), who was editing within the last day, the unblock request cannot be taken seriously no matter which account it is requested from. —DoRD (talk) 13:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]