User talk:The Callipygian

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Um... This is likely a forlorn hope, but if you were to realise that there are still rules, policies, and guidelines on how to edit the encyclopedia then you might be able to contribute usefully. However, I fully expect that you will resume your odious editing as soon as the block expires - in which case the next block will likely be indefinite. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) One of the policies you are violating is no personal attacks, which includes your talkpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Callipygian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah but the personal attack was on myself. Just unblock me already. I won't be a pest

Decline reason:

You did not mean those personal attacks for yourself. That is simply not true. Block endorsed. — PeterSymonds (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Callipygian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thought wiki gave warnings. That's all I needed, I had no clue I couldn't say what I wanted on my own page. Won't happen again but I'd appreciate it if I could continue a discussion I'm having.

Decline reason:

Per the evil Spartan below. — Sandstein 22:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sure you knew all about that. Given that your second edit was to give an in depth policy vote, and third was to add twinkle to your monobook, I seriously doubt this is your first account. The Evil Spartan (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Callipygian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Still should have gotten a warning. I've read that is wiki's policy. Or do they only matter to non-admins?

Decline reason:

You actually got quite a few warnings, despite your attempts to blank them ([1], [2]). Sorry, but you can't fool anyone here. Talk page protected.— Blueboy 96 22:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/The Callipygian for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per confirmation of blatantly obvious sockpuppetry, the block timer has been reset. Blueboy 96 12:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]