User talk:The Call of the Wild
March 2012
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ironholds (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)- If you are Jack Merridew, you're evading. If you're not, you clearly lack the common sense necessary to edit non-disruptively. Either way, enjoy your vacation. Ironholds (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- "Enjoy your vacation", haha, and the "short-sighted lemming" quip in the log[1], hoho? Hilarious. Do you always find yourself called on to taunt users when you block them, Ironholds? Bishonen | talk 22:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC).
- Thanks, Bish. He was fast to block User:Uncontroversial Obscurity, too. I'm sure someone will get around to blocking User:Alarbus, User:Tycho Magnetic Anomaly-1, User:Sitti Noerbaja and User:Victoria and Albert. No one cares about all the good they did (a few do, of course; most won't even look). Best wishes, Buck 23:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC) someone should tell User:Crisco 1492 about User:Sitti Noerbaja…
… is so unseemly. Buck 17:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion#Log of blocks and bans
- and ya missed one ;>
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)