User talk:The Blazing Sword

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Blazing Sword (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Um, what the hell?

Decline reason:

"Um, what the hell" is not grounds for a block review. The information you provide below provides sufficient evidence for a block on WP:SOCK grounds. — Yamla 16:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Blazing Sword (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you show me some concrete evidence that I'm Flameviper? And don't just give me some half-assed boilerplate crap. I want to actually discuss this. Put my page on your watchlist, or whatever. Let's talk rationally.

Decline reason:

As per Yamla below: You admit that you use the same computer as the blocked user. — Sandstein 21:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no evidence that would suggest that I'm a "sock puppet" of Flameviper. Supporting an unpopular opinion isn't grounds for banning. And besides, I already quit. I was just coming back here to check.

Even if I was a "sock puppet", you didn't need to ban me. Why do you feel that when somebody leaves this website, you have to disgrace them constantly?

I'm sick of it. Just put my user page the way it was.

Actually, I see.

I see why you blocked me. I disagreed with your banning of a usesr. Is that how things work around here? You just block everyone who has a different opinion than you?

Or do you just accuse your opponents of some arbitrary violation like "sock puppets" so you can discredit them without addressing their argument?

I'll bet that's what you're going to do to me, isn't it? You're going to lock this page so that I can't even speak. You did it to Flameviper, and you're doing it to me. Just because we both use the same computer doesn't mean we're the same person.

You admit that you use the same computer. Therefore you are either a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet, either way grounds for blocking under WP:SOCK. --Yamla 17:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]