User talk:The 5th Doctor/Storage 1

OK FOLKS, LOOK BUT DON'T TOUCH. DIG? WANNA CHAT WITH THE DOCTOR? COME HERE

The 5th Doctor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The 5th Doctor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dennis Wise has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dennis Wise was changed by The 5th Doctor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853937 on 2014-07-18T21:15:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:15, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dennis Wise. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fat Guts

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Fat Guts, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 23:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fat Guts is sourced. The 5th Doctor (talk) 23:22, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Diego Maradona. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 23:24, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Fat Guts. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 23:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Diego Maradona. GILO A&E⇑ 23:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The 5th Doctor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that for Gilo to send me a batch of templates was arrogant, as was taking the case to AIV instead of ANI where I would have had my chance to explain myself and more time would have been taken over any decision, even if I did turn out to be wrong. Bottom line: I did not set out to vandalize the article and my worst crime was edit-warring coming close to 3RR. My latest action on the article in question was a self-revert and I added this to the AIV section (on which I was not informed, I had to find it myself). It is patently obvious looking at the rest of my edits that while the occasional issue may seem problematic, I have not proven to be above conversation and consensus and I am not what you would call a vandal of the conventional sense if judging the other reported cases on AIV at any time. If my addition of "fat guts" caused a BLP issue or required more support then that was all any editor needed to explain that to me rather than bombard me with robotic templates which were concocted to communicate with actual vandals. Moreover, I'm 99% sure I would have removed the segment myself as I did when this became critical. I genuinely believe this action is harsh in light of my evident good faith.

Decline reason:

It's not. "Assume good faith" lapses when bad faith is shown; your obvious and deliberate BLP violations, even after being warned, are unacceptable. When your block expires, I hope you can go back to constructive editing. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 05:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mafia

Please see the exchange I had with User:Rsrikanth05 here. Please comment there if needed. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the subject not having been gone into thoroughly and that there is more information out there than what was on the section. At the time I edited, the only two citations were both pointing to Arabic and because etymology ultimately looks at a language of origin, I thought the only listed language should receive an early mention. No big deal, it looks WP:LAME in any case so I will not be returning to that matter. --The 5th Doctor (talk) 04:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Whipping Bоys

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Whipping Bоys, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mick twig (talk) 14:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]