User talk:TheUnablePoep

Welcome!

Hello, TheUnablePoep, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tick oaT Two, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dan arndt (talk) 06:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tick oaT Two

The article Tick oaT Two has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tick oaT Two for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tick oaT Two is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tick oaT Two until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Storchy (talk) 08:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tick oaT Two

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tick oaT Two requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VickKiang (talk) 07:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the creator, nor do I personally know them. I simply made a page for it for the sake of making a page. The reason for the deletion is therefore unjustified. TheUnablePoep (talk) 02:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. However, how would a game invented by a random YouTube channel and posted in other channels (1, 2, 3 meet the notability guidelines WP:GNG that we require on Wikipedia, and also the policies of WP:V and WP:NOR? Also, how does the article contain a Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance claim of significance? Further, if you are unrelated to the channel, how did you write an extensive article on the game (there isn't really much info available online detailing the gameplay, the YouTube videos are very short and there is also a Reddit post, so I'm wondering where did you get these detailed information from)? Also, numerous other editors have attempted to promote this obviously non-notable game, see User talk:UtotNaPinasokSaRef,Tumigas, User talk:WilhelmKreusberg, User talk:94.207.78.172, User talk:S. Zeits, User talk:Lil timmo, and have been warned for disruptive editing. Therefore, I advice that you refrain from creating any article on this non-notable variant again, otherwise your editing might also be considered to be disruptive. If you have questions about writing new articles, see Help:Your first article, you could also go to Wikipedia:Teahouse for general help with editing. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 02:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I understand. Thank you. TheUnablePoep (talk) 01:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]