User talk:TheTigersRule

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

Talk page access

You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. Although, frankly, you need to do that from your original account. Stop messing about. -- Yamla (talk) 14:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:

Dear @Yamla,

I apologize for my "messing about". I am trying to understand Wikipedia's policies so that after 6 months, an administrator can review my ban in accordance with WP:Standard Offer , and I might be allowed back. I understand I messed up. I vandalized Wikipedia. There, I said it. However, I deeply regret my actions, which is why I created a new account to "Start Over." On this new account (@I Love Pets 12), I reverted the vandalism I had once caused. You can look through my 90+ edits on @I Love Pets 12, in which I reverted and warned users vandalizing. I then was banned on that account, because I block evaded. I did not know that was a thing until I read WP: Block evasion. I understand, now, that I was wrong. Am wrong. Yet I am asking for a second chance. I believe that my 90+ vandal reverts show that I can be trusted not to vandalize again. If I were to be unblocked, I understand I would be on a tight leash. (Watched carefully) I know this isn't a formal unblock request, but I am begging you to consider unblocking me. TheTigersRule (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In Addition,

While blocked, I have found out that I can use Abuse Log to find vandalism! This is a game changer!! TheTigersRule (talk) 18:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheTigersRule (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I messed up. I vandalized Wikipedia. There, I said it. However, I deeply regret my actions, which is why I created a new account to "Start Over." On this new account (@I Love Pets 12), I reverted the vandalism I had once caused. You can look through my 90+ edits on @I Love Pets 12, in which I reverted and warned users vandalizing. I then was banned on that account, because I block evaded. I did not know that was a thing until I read WP: Block evasion. I understand, now, that I was wrong. Am wrong. Yet I am asking for a second chance. I believe that my 90+ vandal reverts show that I can be trusted not to vandalize again. If I were to be unblocked, I understand I would be on a tight leash.(Watched carefully) I am a reformed vandal. In addition, I know that I am not appealing on my first account, but I no longer have access to it so I am appealing here. TheTigersRule (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can follow the standard offer. Make an appeal via UTRS after six months of no sock puppetry or other block evasion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:05, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I won't be reviewing your block. Your actions over at User talk:I Love Pets 12 showed pretty clearly that you should not be unblocked so I firmly oppose anyone lifting the block. Again, your best bet is to take advantage of WP:SO. Six months with zero edits, then write an unblock request that addresses your blatant vandalism, bad-faith attempts to mislead, and block evasion. No sooner than 2023-06-21, and only assuming you stop editing, starting now. --Yamla (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]