User talk:TheSunIsAStar147147

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Advanced Placement, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. No, AP does not redirect to Advanced Placement ‎. Don't make edits based on assumptions. Meters (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC) Hi TheSunIsAStar147147, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning templates

Please make sure to put the warning templates in a section that contains the Month and year, thanks Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 00:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok i get it. thanks TheSunIsAStar147147 (talk) 00:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, TheSunIsAStar147147! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! scope_creep^Talk 23:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ural-4320

It wasn't vandalism100.11.77.202 (talk) 12:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay. i apologize for the mistake. TheSunIsAStar147147 (talk) 14:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re: Brooke Weston Academy (Page protection)

Continued from here.

I don't know all the ins and outs of user access levels, but I'd just wait and see what happens with the semi-protection request you submitted. Don't resubmit, just wait for a verdict. Given the level of vandalism there in recent days I'd say your request is likely to be approved, but my concern is that semi-protection won't solve the article's recent vandalism issues due to most of those vandal accounts (quite likely the work of a single individual) being close to having confirmed status, thus semi-protection might not be the most effective way to handle it.

If semi-protection is denied, go straight to ANI if the problem persists. This way an admin can block the individual accounts/users, which I'd guess will be much more effective at ending the nonsense.

If you want some free advice, avoid that article (and the accounts) completely until there's a verdict, just to avoid being dragged into an edit war. Any further vandal edits, go back and fix them after page protection when the vandals won't be able to just revert you again. SolarFlash^Discussion 00:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leave me alone

Leave me alone ... for goodness sake, grow up.

Various editors have advised you of your damaging behaviour, to which your response has been to ignore by continuing your actions, and to censor the advice. Now, you are bleating about being left alone.

Both your actions and use of language suggest you immature, or of low educational standard.

In addition to the advice given by various editors, see a recent message you deleted, you need to consider why you are editing Wikipedia. Your pattern of edits suggests it is more for your personal reasons, perhaps a warped and vicarious feeling of power by threatening others, than for the improvement of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.124.67 (talk) 18:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from another editor

Copy of a recent message from another editor which is posted elsewhere, see [1]: TheSunIsAStar147147, please be extremely careful and thorough while using tools, especially if you are undoing someone else's work or issuing some kind of warning. Onus is on the tool user (you) to ensure tool is not misused, not used lazily, no knee jerk actions, no one is antagonised unduly, etc. There are more than one victims of your learning curve. Yes, I agree, time to close the issue. Seems bigger ball is in your court, perhaps slow down or stop using the tool until you learn to be more proficient.

ok ok i already read it and i understood it. i promise - from now on, i will be slower with twinkle (that's the name of the tool used to revert/warn and a bunch more stuff). TheSunIsAStar147147 (talk) 18:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 13:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]