User talk:TheSimorgh

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[1]] regarding unsourced material. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "[[2]]".The discussion is about the topic [3]. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Cheers --Reza Fariborz (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TheSimorgh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheSimorgh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, TheSimorgh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Pahlevun (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

Hi. You've been blocked from editing for 48 hours due to violating the Three revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 20:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir. I did not do anything except informing that article about an official candidature related by an official website. I also did fight against censure made by persons who don't know Iranian politic enough to know about a political group that have been councielcely non mediatical to protect its activity and been created since 40 years. Better than blocking me can you watch this website www.homayounfard.com and consider the situation with a minimum of respect for the work I've did ? Thanks to make that kind of limitations to me. --TheSimorgh (talk) 20:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did, you edit warred. Please see our conflict of interest policy, if you are only here to promote one group. I'm afraid will not visit that website, it goes outside the scope of this block. I don't know what "mediatical" is, but the block is unrelated to content, but to a violation of the Three revert rule (see Revert), instead of using the article talk page. El_C 20:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So what about Pahlevun who did the same than me and also violating your Three revert rule ? And ok you don't visit the site ? You condemn me without understanding why I did defended my publication agains censure removal from other users. Best regards.--TheSimorgh (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have evidence that Pahlevun did so, please provide evidence in the form of diffs. I did not find it to be so. But Reza Fariborz did and was also blocked. No, I refuse to get drawn into your content dispute, which is my prerogative. But you should disclose your conflict of interest if you're only here to promote one group—if that's all you are here to do. El_C 21:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You say that Pahlevun didn't violated the 3RR ? So what is this ?

Here is the rule "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page" ok ?

So what is this ?

09:25, 7 April 2017‎ Pahlevun (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (31,756 bytes) (-127)‎ . . (alef.ir/vdcjmoexyuqeihz.fsfu.html?458960) (undo) 10:32, 7 April 2017‎ Pahlevun (talk | contribs)‎ . . (31,131 bytes) (-625)‎ . . (No reliable source provided) (undo) 12:58, 7 April 2017‎ Pahlevun (talk | contribs)‎ . . (31,131 bytes) (-5,004)‎ . . (undo) 16:09, 7 April 2017‎ Pahlevun (talk | contribs)‎ . . (31,131 bytes) (-4,994)‎ . . (Undid revision 774290039 by TheSimorgh (talk)) (undo)

and today still the same politician targeted... (cur | prev) 11:54, 8 April 2017‎ Pahlevun (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (31,131 bytes) (-4,994)‎ . . (undo)

Four times yesterday and a explicit will of censuring information here. And you tell me he did not violated information ? I also demand to undo his last change in the article. Thanks as advance.

Best regards.--TheSimorgh (talk) 13:49, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not diffs. If you want me to consider your evidence, you will compile the diffs like anyone else. El_C 08:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Iranian presidential election, 2017.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Note : I will put this to you very simply. If you have any other source, like a reputed newspaper, including those published in Persian indicating that Hossein Homayoun Fard Mohammad Abadi is contesting the election, then add it as the source. Do not add his own website as source as it does not qualify as a reliable source per WP:RS. If you add a newspaper as a source and the other editors are satisfied that it is a reputed and reliable newspaper, then nobody will revert your edits. For the time being I have removed his candidature from the list. Jupitus Smart 08:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]