User talk:TheRectificator

August 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Carles Puigdemont. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 07:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did not do that. Please provide any proof of Mr. Puigdemont finishing his bachelor studies. It is false that he obtained a university degree, as you can readly verify from his C.V.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRectificator (talk • contribs)

The article already states, with accompanying sources, that Puigdemont did not finish college (see the "Early life and family" section). The remainder of your edits are blatant policy violations. You need to go to the article talk page and get consensus for the changes you want to make.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:22, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TheRectificator, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheRectificator! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Neutrality is necessary

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC) I did not do that.[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

August 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Carles Puigdemont. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at ETA (separatist group), you may be blocked from editing. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]