User talk:TheRebelliousFew

July 2023

Hello, I'm Prolog. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Second Chechen War, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ukrainian Air Force, you may be blocked from editing. Prolog (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

@Prolog and @Fnlayson, can you review the December 2023 contributions of @TheRebelliousFew when you are able? It seems that they have continued to add information that isn't supported by sources and have deceptively marked some of their edits as "minor". Some examples are:

- Increasing the number of Su-57 aircraft and Ka-50 helicopters for the Russian Air Force without adding new sources (and doubling down after having an edit reverted).

- Adding unsourced information about the ineffectiveness of sanctions on Russia and original research about the effectiveness of the Ka-50

- Adding unsourced information about the T-72 relating to its use in Ukraine and supposed production advances

- Adding information about Su-35 deliveries to Iran without adding a reliable supporting source

- Adding outdated information to support unsourced original research in the Ukrainian Air Force article, as well as changing a heading to say it uses 2021 information when the sources date from 2023.

Since this user has ignored two warnings on their talk page about adding unsourced or poorly sourced content and ignored multiple revert notices (and has not shown a willingness to start sourcing all their additions), a partial block or a topic ban may be necessary. Please have a look and decide whether either of these measures are appropriate at this stage. TROPtastic (talk) 07:09, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Prolog (talk) 14:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please note that only extended-confirmed users are allowed to make edits related to the Russo-Ukrainian War (WP:GS/RUSUKR). Prolog (talk) 14:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do use Wikipedia pages in accordance with the rules. Your edits to Talk:Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine#c-TheRebelliousFew-20240117183800-Melaneas-20231123232000 , Talk:Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine#c-TheRebelliousFew-20240117201300-Czello-20231024075600 , Talk:Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine#c-TheRebelliousFew-20240117183200-49.181.47.40-20231204190400 violate WP:SOAPBOX. Thank you! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 21:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to talk pages, I’ll freely express what comes to my mind as I please. If you don’t like another opinion, then that quite honestly is not my issue. Talk pages are here to create discussions, not censor one’s opinion. TheRebelliousFew (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 23:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For what? Sharing my opinion? Censorship at it’s finest. TheRebelliousFew (talk) 15:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship at its finest, yet again, for the third account. I tried being reasonable the first two accounts, providing as many sources as I could, but y’all weren’t having your Leftist narrative being challenged or questioned. Good riddance to you Leftist idiots. Glad to see this place slowly dying away. TheRebelliousFew (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously going to keep making personal attacks at us just for trying to improve the article? This is a lot of incivility you're doing. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I will. Don’t like it? Cry until something happens. TheRebelliousFew (talk) 17:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admitting to sock puppetry, too. I shouldn't be surprised. — Czello ^(music) 16:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldn’t be surprised you left-leaning idiots are this braindead. I guarantee if I had added something criticizing Russian propaganda even further without sources, you would’ve been just fine and left it. Don’t lie to yourself. TheRebelliousFew (talk) 17:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]