User talk:TheRealBalalaikaMaster

CS1 error on LG Display

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page LG Display, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

I saw that you made three edits to United States dollar with the edit summary "heart". Such edit summaries are probably worse than no edit summary at all, as meaningless edit summaries are often a sign of vandalism and are likely to raise suspicions of disruptive editing. Two of the edits triggered the "may have issues" filter on my watchlist. To avoid any misunderstandings, you might want to either actually describe your edits or leave the edit summary blank. I recommend reading WP:ES for more information. - ZLEA _T\^C 02:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Two of your recent edit summaries—1 and 2—are serious breeches of Wikipedia's civility policy. Additional similar comments will generally result in a block. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of COI template

Hi, I saw in this edit to Edgewell Personal Care, you removed the Conflict of Interest template. I checked the article's talk page, and nothing indicates that it should have been removed. Kimen8 (talk) 18:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's right. TheRealBalalaikaMaster (talk) 18:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How are you sure there was no conflict of interest, and that it was resolved such that the template should be removed (the template is from December 2020)? Kimen8 (talk) 18:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the article and saw that there was no egregious commercial content. Furthermore, I added more factual content to balance the article, even if there was an initial COI. TheRealBalalaikaMaster (talk) 23:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted my own revert of your edits to RAND Corporation

I realized the better course was to preserve your edits because you did add important information cited to reliable sources. So I reverted my own revert. However, you did introduce several grammar errors which I had to clean up. You used the present tense in several places where a native English speaker would use the past tense.

You also inserted a factual assertion that failed verification: the idea that RAND stands for "Research ANd Development", which is not in the cited sources. Please review core policies WP:NOR and WP:V. Coolcaesar (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am in fact a native english speaker. TheRealBalalaikaMaster (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also the phrase "research and development" is cited in the sources. I was simply paraphrasing from the wiki article on Douglas Aircraft Company. TheRealBalalaikaMaster (talk) 15:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Coolcaesar. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should also calm down, just like Coolcaesar. TheRealBalalaikaMaster (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coolcaesar offered constructive criticism about your apparent poor grammar. A good editor takes constructive criticism to better themselves. Telling an editor to calm down for offering constructive criticism is not constructive and does not give the appearance of an editor who is willing to learn from their mistakes. I would take a step back and take the opportunity to learn from this. - ZLEA _T\^C 20:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that if you believe Coolcaesar made a mistake, you should have a civil discussion about it. There is no need to get personal about it. - ZLEA _T\^C 20:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]