User talk:TheRaulRomero

TheRaulRomero, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi TheRaulRomero! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, willpower (will.i.am album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not include the image File:Miley Cyrus - Can't Be Tamed single.png to the article Can't Be Tamed without a proper fair use explanation why it can be used in more than article for legal reason. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:04, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to ThatPower. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ready, Set, Don't Go (feat. Miley Cyrus).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ready, Set, Don't Go (feat. Miley Cyrus).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We Can't Stop

Please read both Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Can't Stop and WP:NSONGS. The article was redirected because it did not meet the conditions in WP:NSONGS. It still doesn't. Being released does not automatically qualify a single for an article. Please do create an individual article until the conditions in WP:NSONGS are met.—Kww(talk) 17:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:NSONGS. Being released does not qualify a song for an article. Having a video does not qualify a song for an article. None of that is relevant for the creation of articles. Don't undo redirects unless you can actually demonstrate the song meets WP:NSONGS by having significant coverage in independent sources, has charted, or has had notable versions performed by multiple artists.—Kww(talk) 17:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image resizing

CD covers are typically limited to a 300x300 size. Edit-warring with the bot was not good behaviour, and disabling the bot was disruptive. What made you think that was a good idea?—Kww(talk) 19:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:We Can't Stop.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:We Can't Stop.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. An edit that you recently made to We Can't Stop seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So the requested deletion of an article about a song already released, with charts, music critics reviews and 27 references under the argument "no sources. no confirmation. WP:CRYSTAL that it is notable. redirect for now" should be called "productive"? Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Mdann52. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bangerz (album), with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mdann52 (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bangerz (Deluxe Version).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bangerz (Deluxe Version).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bangerz.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bangerz.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bangerz (Deluxe Version).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bangerz (Deluxe Version).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bangerz (Deluxe Version).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bangerz (Deluxe Version).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bangerz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bangerz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Singer-songwriter

Will you please read the article titled singer-songwriter and understand that Miley Cyrus is not one? Yes, she sings. Yes, she writes some songs, but she is not a singer-songwriter.—Kww(talk) 20:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that she isn't a singer. I never said that she isn't a songwriter. I said she isn't a singer-songwriter. Please read singer-songwriter. That article will tell you what a singer-songwriter is, and that description doesn't match Miley Cyrus. Having the same words doesn't mean things are the same: a flap jack is neither a flap nor a jack.—Kww(talk) 01:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what? that isnt possible. its the same words.--Raúl Romero (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the article?—Kww(talk) 02:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to We Can't Stop. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bangerz (album), you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 16:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Bangerz (album) ‎ does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! I undid my own edit and removed the warning from your talk page. Did you not notice? Don't answer please. Just making a point. Dawnseeker2000 16:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not touch my talk page

I've reverted you several times now. That message should be fairly clear. Dawnseeker2000 16:46, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Don't talk me like that. If i have something to say you i'll touch ANY TALK PAGE have a nice day That message should be fairly clear. --Raúl Romero (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC)--Raúl Romero (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC)--Raúl Romero (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC)--Raúl Romero (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC)--Raúl Romero (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bangerz (album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Search -Mike Will Made It Bangerz Miley Cyrus- into google, he is executive producing the album, not to mention the source cited is about the album. STATic message me! 17:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bangerz cover.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bangerz cover.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. STATic message me! 17:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bangerz.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bangerz.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. STATic message me! 17:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apology from Dawnseeker2000

Hi PaulRomero

Just stopping by to say I'm very sorry for our rather abrupt incident yesterday. Maybe I shouldn't have been editing WP. I was not having a great day and when I inadvertently reverted your edit on that article it only made me feel worse. I undid my mistakes as quickly as possible, and when you messaged me on my talk page I only wanted to remove it so as to not have a reminder of mistake. That's all. Anyway, I didn't mean to come off as rude, and I was, so I'm wishing you a great day today. Apologies again, Dawnseeker2000 18:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bangerz (album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 01:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from See You Again (Miley Cyrus song) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 00:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ashtrays and Heartbreaks, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 03:08, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Party in the U.S.A. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 19:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TheRaulRomero reported by User:STATicVapor (Result: ). Thank you. STATic message me! 19:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Party in the U.S.A. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BANGERZ

Please take another look. I added it about 45 minutes ago. WikiRedactor (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like, you can try that, although I've seen several album introductions flow from an overview into production, critical reception, commercial performance, and wrap it up with promotion. I'm going to make a minor tweak and add the actual sales numbers to the certification mentioned in the lead and see what you think. WikiRedactor (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, I just re-added the bit about the tour in the lead; I like the way it reads now. WikiRedactor (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about once more year-end lists are published (almost certainly within the month), we create an Accolades subhead under Critical reception? I'm just hesitant to add that single Rolling Stone review, because I don't want the article to come across as biased in favor of Miley by just adding that one positive review right now. WikiRedactor (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be a pain, but I don't think that the deluxe cover is considered fair-use here :-( I agree, I'd like to have all five versions, but I don't think policy will allow for it. WikiRedactor (talk) 00:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 15:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for disruptive editing and admission of sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Breakout (Platinum Edition).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Breakout (Platinum Edition).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]