User talk:TheROMANCENTURION

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with T. Hariri. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. snigbrook (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Rome Review

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Rome Review, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rome Review. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. snigbrook (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

????

Why did you nominate THE ROME REVIEW for deletion? It's well-sourced, albeit maybe not well-written.

TheROMANCENTURION (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Rome Review

I'm not deleting it, I'm nominating it for deletion; anyone can participate in the deletion discussion. I don't think it meets the relevant guidelines, as there doesn't appear to be any coverage in reliable sources, so if you don't want it to be deleted you will have to provide evidence of coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. snigbrook (talk) 19:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

could you explain a little more? what do you mean independent of the subject?

i just used the site with documents to quote the magazine itself. all the other sources, however, are other sources separate from the magazine

TheROMANCENTURION (talk) 19:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the sources are all either press releases, blogs, or the websites of contributors to the magazine. There is one that is possibly reliable (http://english.unc.edu/creative/CHAPTER_n_VERSE_spring_09.pdf) but it is only trivial coverage which isn't enough. As there has only been one issue of the magazine so far, maybe it's too soon for it to have the amount of coverage that is needed. snigbrook (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i understand now. the issue hasn't come out yet. according to the press release and other content, the issue comes out saturday the 27th. can we wait until then before deleting it? there'll be a lot of coverage at that time.

TheROMANCENTURION (talk) 19:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It will probably stay until then, unless the deletion discussion is closed early. snigbrook (talk) 19:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]