User talk:ThePersonWhoEditsStuffAboutTech

Welcome!

Hi ThePersonWhoEditsStuffAboutTech! I noticed your contributions to MacOS Sierra and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Glen (talk) 02:51, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to IOS 7 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: IOS 7 was changed by ThePersonWhoEditsStuffAboutTech (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855088 on 2020-08-18T02:01:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Windows 10. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 06:37, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Updating your discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 22:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at One America News Network, you may be blocked from editing. Removing a whole slew of reliable sources is highly disruptive. Please don't do it again. Bishonen | tålk 22:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your edit on OANN

Greatjob! What thhey haveon there callin it a far right conservative news network... by "Credible " sources... I love how the entire sentence is obviously opinionated. They deemed your edit wrong. This is what makes wiki and now Google to be confirmed as being biased. Good day to you sir/madam keep up the good fight. 71.220.45.60 (talk) 04:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to J. C. Jackson. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 19:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at N'Keal Harry, you may be blocked from editing. BusterD (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Midwest montage

I’d advise you that making such a significant deviation from what the montage length has been for a while is going to require more of a defensive argument rather than trying to pin it on me. The Rock Hall is already pictured in the body, but I’d advocate for its inclusion over Cincinnati. 636Buster (talk) 04:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No hate but you're treating it like it's too big to even be read, it takes up less than half of a phone screen. These are 2 very important & iconic midwestern locations that are unique to both of those cities, and some might not even know what or where they are without the montage. It's a good idea for the Rock HOF to be there because of how iconic it is in the Midwest, and Over-the-Rhine as well. Both are one-of-a-kind pieces of midwestern America. ThePersonWhoEditsStuffAboutTech (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]