User talk:TheOuthouseMouse

A letter to the editor is unlikely to meet the requirement for reliable sources --pgk^(talk) 07:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add tags to articles -- especially heavily-edited and carefully-scrutinized featured articles -- without discussing in some detail on the Talk page what specific aspects of the article you have issue with and how they can be fixed. This ground has been covered over and over, and without reading through what has already been said you are not contributing. thanks. bikeable (talk) 19:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my addition to the TALK page of global warming under "'only' is not NPOV"--The Outhouse Mouse 19:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3rr

This is your warning re WP:3RR William M. Connolley 20:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

Those who worship the GW theory have several admins in their church. Kyaa the Catlord 18:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged. All you or I can do is to put factual information out there. S. Fred Singer is well-educated on the subject and the GW true believers reject him out-of-hand.

They're almost as bad as some of the people I run into in my work on the Islam related articles. GW is almost as bad as Islamism, imho. I'm staying away from editting GW so that if it comes up for GA, I can veto it. Besides, it isn't worth another ban. :P Kyaa the Catlord 19:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dixy Lee Ray, the former governor of Washington state, wrote some interesting things about GW as well.--The Outhouse Mouse 19:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GW is already a GA, as well as a FA :-) William M. Connolley 19:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, they're autodelisted after being made FA. Too bad. Now to investigate FA's delisting criteria... Kyaa the Catlord 09:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William M Connolly is one revert away from 3RR on Global Warming. He's all lined up. Maybe he'll realize his bias if those who feel his actions are unjust work together... Come on over! Kyaa the Catlord 16:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hockey stick.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Hockey stick.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Stop trolling. This is an encylopedia, not your personal debate forum.

Henderson King Yoakum

Thanks for writing this article; it was on my to-do list for almost a year now. -- Kendrick7 09:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Done. Next time, please use unblock-auto instead of unblock if you are not blocked directly.

Request handled by: Yamla 18:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Wirt Davis, II

A tag has been placed on Wirt Davis, II, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pyrospirit ^{Flames Fire} 16:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, apparantly it is notable. Sorry about that, I'll remove the tag. Pyrospirit ^{Flames Fire} 16:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hello! I see your seeking adoption. If your still interested I'd me more then happy to answer your questions and help you out. You can respond back to this by leaving a message here. If you have decided that you no longer wish to be adopted, please remove the adoptee's userbox from your userpage. Thanks, hope to hear from you soon! Matthew Yeager 03:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll adopt you

As someone who will be moving to the Metroplex next summer, I'd love to adopt you and help you along! --DodgerOfZion 19:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DFW Meetup

~~Hi!~~ ~~Hello!~~ Howdy! You've been invited to the Dallas/Fort Worth meetup (part of Wikipedia:Meetup). If you are interested, visit our page and sign up and suggest something, or help us decide where and when the next meeting will be. Cheers!

Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 00:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you undo this edit?

"Journalist Carlson followed up on Bush's alleged remark by reviewing a videotape of the interview on Larry King's show. Carlson found that Tucker had in fact not uttered the entreaty, "Please don't kill me" nor words to that effect.^[1] Bush denied Carlson's allegations. No other witness corroborated Carlson's story."

This Slate article doesn't state anything that is in this paragraph. In fact, it concludes with: "It's almost as though the press has decided that the story is too ugly to repeat, even though it's obviously true. But at a time when the topic of governors and clemency is in the news, it's simply poor news judgment not to bring it up."

Now why would you undo my edit with your remark: "Please don't remove portions of an article simply because you have a personal belief that a citation is not reliable.)"

I have no problem with the reliability of the article. It simply does not say what you want it to say.--Rrand (talk) 03:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment in the edit that I just made in the article. --The Outhouse Mouse (talk) 04:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

As a current or past contributor to a related article or as someone who may otherwise be interested, I wanted to let you know about WikiProject Texas Tech University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Texas Tech and the Texas Tech University System. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of tasks. Thanks! — Wordbuilder (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, still stuck in Jersey.

Circumstances arose, like my mother's surgery, which bound me to New Jersey for a little longer. One of these days though, one of these days, I will call Denton home. Sorry I took so long to respond to you, been off-Wiki a while. DodgerOfZion (talk)

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 21:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hugoton Royalty Trust

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hugoton Royalty Trust, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hugotontrust.com/pages/about.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.crosstimberstrust.com/pages/about.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

A tag has been placed on Cross Timbers Royalty Trust requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TheOuthouseMouse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TheOuthouseMouse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TheOuthouseMouse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TheOuthouseMouse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ Noah, Tim. Slate, 2 Dec 2005 [1]

[1] Noah, Tim. Slate, 2 Dec 2005 [1]

[1]