User talk:TheNuggeteer/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions about User:TheNuggeteer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Re: newsletter
Yea, I have the next newsletter started, I don't have all of the content written yet, and I'm not interested in doing that with my limited time these days. If you'd like to though, yes you can work on the newsletter - I started it here. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I also don't think we need a "selected article" section in the newsletter. The newsletter is more to let people in the project know what's going on. I think it just adds clutter to the newsletter. Thanks though for leading the effort to write the newsletter, and create another cyclone cup. I think that's a great idea. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Do you like the newsletter, or adjustments need to be made? How am I going to elect the member of the month? Do I need to add the TC anniversary?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
03:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)- It's on the right track so far. I don't know if we need member of the month, maybe avoid that, and avoid the TC anniversary. I think the newsletter can be simpler, like a way to notify members of the cyclone cup, for instance, or of big changes and proposals. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm just going to add the member of the month, also, I'm wondering if I'm going to need to add these:
- Special
- FT Update
- Storms of the month table
- Storms of the month prose
- MYEXPERIENCE
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
11:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)- Can you check the newsletter here and tell me the missing topics?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
11:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)- Yea, you probably don't need "storms of the month". People who receive the newsletter probably know about the newer storms. Similar for member of the month. It's just a way of picking out an editor, but a lot of people might feel like "why not them", so I don't want it to be a popularity contest. I'm guessing you don't need to include the good articles either, since there have been hundreds since the last newsletter. The important thing to include is ongoing projects in the WPTC, pointing out discussions that people might not know about, and giving updates. Also, be sure to use this newsletter page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm just placing the newsletter in my sandbox to prepare replacement.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
03:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC) - I don't want to remove the editor's pick, because I want to recognize Tails and Dylan both for their contributions.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
03:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)- But why them specifically? I worry that editor of the month could just be a favoritism thing based on whoever writes the newsletter. I don't want to have a clique. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- If it was a favoritism thingy, I would have picked Typhoon Ampil or something. and I don't exactly have the best experiences with Dylan.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
08:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- If it was a favoritism thingy, I would have picked Typhoon Ampil or something. and I don't exactly have the best experiences with Dylan.
- But why them specifically? I worry that editor of the month could just be a favoritism thing based on whoever writes the newsletter. I don't want to have a clique. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm just placing the newsletter in my sandbox to prepare replacement.
- Yea, you probably don't need "storms of the month". People who receive the newsletter probably know about the newer storms. Similar for member of the month. It's just a way of picking out an editor, but a lot of people might feel like "why not them", so I don't want it to be a popularity contest. I'm guessing you don't need to include the good articles either, since there have been hundreds since the last newsletter. The important thing to include is ongoing projects in the WPTC, pointing out discussions that people might not know about, and giving updates. Also, be sure to use this newsletter page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can you check the newsletter here and tell me the missing topics?
- I'm just going to add the member of the month, also, I'm wondering if I'm going to need to add these:
- It's on the right track so far. I don't know if we need member of the month, maybe avoid that, and avoid the TC anniversary. I think the newsletter can be simpler, like a way to notify members of the cyclone cup, for instance, or of big changes and proposals. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Do you like the newsletter, or adjustments need to be made? How am I going to elect the member of the month? Do I need to add the TC anniversary?
Would you be interested in a bit of mentorship?
Hey there, TheNuggeteer :) I came across what happened at ANI last night and I'm really sorry. I enjoyed seeing your enthusiasm and the attention you brought to underserved areas at DYK, and if you'd like to exercise your chops while you sit out, I want to help you find your footing. Here's what I had in mind:
- Whenever you feel so inclined (but fairly regularly), pick something going on at DYK. An unapproved or approved nomination, or a hook in prep, queue, or on the Main Page.
- If it's an unapproved nomination, write up (but do not post) a review of a specific hook or of the full nomination, as appropriate. If it's a promoted hook or approved nomination, look for an error – if you don't find one, find a different hook/nomination instead.
- Post what you find on my talk page (preferably formatted the way you would post it to the live page). I'll be there to provide feedback, tell you what you missed and what you got right :) if there's an error I need to action, I'll make a post and credit you for finding it.
- No low-hanging fruit – don't review nominations by Epicgenius, Sammi Brie, or other quickpass nominators unless they turn out to not be quickpass after all. No borderline interestingness challenges or other subjective issues, no commenting on ongoing disputes (that would almost certainly violate your topic ban).
Would you be interested? I would understand if you wanted to just leave DYK alone for a while :) Daniel, would this idea be a topic ban violation? If it is, I can go ask for an exemption at AN, but IAR, really. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron Sure! I really missed participating in DYK.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
10:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)- Awesome! Let's see what Daniel says and go from there. :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 10:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron - this wasn't a unilateral sanction by an uninvolved administrator, but rather a consensus close of a community discussion, so I don't have any sort of implicit authority around interpretation of the topic ban. On the basis that you're an administrator and provided a tight rein is kept on things, I'm thinking it will probably be OK? Daniel (talk) 22:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- All right. I'll make a notification post on AN and see if there any significant objections, but I think we're good to go. TheNuggeteer, whenever works for you :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm ready
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
06:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm ready
- Another question: Can I help another user make a good article even though I'm not the one nominating? I just want to make 2017 Pacific typhoon season into a good topic, but a lot of the articles are huge, and I don't think I can add more, so I'm thinking to help the users who created this article.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)- That depends what you mean. There is nothing stopping you editing articles. However, you cannot nominate or review articles, nor I suspect could you ask another user to nominate or review an article. I would also avoid editing an article that is undergoing a GAN. CMD (talk) 13:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm very puzzled, based on the thread above, why TheNuggeteer posted a request for "FP Mentorship" on my talk page the day after the most recent post in the above thread. With a specific offer of help here, why come to me? Pinging theleekycauldron, who could perhaps include it in the mentorship if allowed by current restrictions or explain why not if not allowed. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- They didn't mention FP, even though I participated there a few times. I honestly don't know if FP is allowed or not.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
03:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)- FP's really not my wheelhouse, so I don't think there's much I could help with there. Although I will note that the DYK mentorship hasn't done much yet, as they haven't stopped by my talk page :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- They didn't mention FP, even though I participated there a few times. I honestly don't know if FP is allowed or not.
- I'm very puzzled, based on the thread above, why TheNuggeteer posted a request for "FP Mentorship" on my talk page the day after the most recent post in the above thread. With a specific offer of help here, why come to me? Pinging theleekycauldron, who could perhaps include it in the mentorship if allowed by current restrictions or explain why not if not allowed. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- That depends what you mean. There is nothing stopping you editing articles. However, you cannot nominate or review articles, nor I suspect could you ask another user to nominate or review an article. I would also avoid editing an article that is undergoing a GAN. CMD (talk) 13:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- All right. I'll make a notification post on AN and see if there any significant objections, but I think we're good to go. TheNuggeteer, whenever works for you :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Afrique Victime
Hello, TheNuggeteer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Afrique Victime at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |
- Hi TheNuggeteer, I've now finished my copy-edit. I made a major structural changes; I moved the section "Political context" further up the article between "Release" and "Tracks". I did this because that section talks about the album in general terms, whereas "Tracks" discusses individual songs—it's usually best to write from the general to the specific, not the other way. I hope you like the change; feel free to re-move that section if you wish. Anyway, good luck with the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Your copyedit was really helpful in (probably getting the article to FA). I already expanded the lead and fixed the reception sections, so this article has a better chance of being an FA. Again, thanks,
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
08:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)- No problem, though I'm not sure it's yet at that level of quality. I'd suggest maintaining it as a GA for a while, there's no need to hurry. One of the citations I checked in the Reception section was inaccurately quoted (check my edit summaries, ICR which one now), so you might wish to check each source is properly used. I also noted there's nothing about chart entries so maybe you could extend that too. Other music articles at FA can be useful guides. And be careful not to violate your topic ban from quality assessments. Good luck and cheers, Baffle☿gab 01:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Your copyedit was really helpful in (probably getting the article to FA). I already expanded the lead and fixed the reception sections, so this article has a better chance of being an FA. Again, thanks,
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Hello! An article you have made was possibly vandalized by a sock per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User disruptively moving articles to userspace. Borgenland (talk) 12:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Borgenland Didn't create that, though I have a similar problem to one article I translated.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
13:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)- Oh right, it was Draft:Rere Madrid. Borgenland (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Moved it to article space where other objective editors can constructively edit and evaluate. Borgenland (talk) 13:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Borgenland Thanks! Tried talking with the editor, but with no result.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
13:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)- I doubt they would. I have also expanded the ANI to include this incident involving yours. Borgenland (talk) 13:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Borgenland Thanks! Tried talking with the editor, but with no result.
- Moved it to article space where other objective editors can constructively edit and evaluate. Borgenland (talk) 13:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oh right, it was Draft:Rere Madrid. Borgenland (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Liberalism in the Philippines
On 21 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liberalism in the Philippines, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the writings of José Rizal, a prominent contributor to liberalism in the Philippines, were adopted by both Philippine independence fighters and American colonial authorities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liberalism in the Philippines. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Liberalism in the Philippines), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Afrique Victime
On 23 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Afrique Victime, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mdou Moctar's 2021 album Afrique Victime was distributed on pre-loaded Nokia 6120 classic cellphones? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Afrique Victime. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Afrique Victime), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate citation script
If you can run a script to find these can you not run a script to fix them, or just fix them yourself? Traumnovelle (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Traumnovelle Sorry, I will.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
03:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
YES24 Live Hall moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to YES24 Live Hall. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it lacks any meaningful context. The page has 5 sections, only one of which has a single sentence, there's no lead, and there's only a single source stating that a concert was held there. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- I actually thought it was already a draft, and it was not in main space, thanks for putting the article there.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
03:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Booba (TV series) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Booba (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[personal attack removed]
. 2601:248:4D01:D3D0:31D9:B1E5:B2E:CE8 (talk) 05:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Is he really a nazi? If so, please provide a reliable source, because this article is a BLP and you can damage the face of this very person, like the incident (I forgot). Thanks,
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
05:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome TheNuggeteer! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
Cielquiparle (talk) 13:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
A goat for you!
Your userpage gave me a good chuckle, so have a goat, Have a nice day!
¿VØ!D? ☄ 21:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter")
13:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?