User talk:TheLuca
Domestic violence and then Welcome!
[edit]You made and edit to domestic violence with the edit summary of deleted a paragraph about an alleged law in Spain which was impossible to verify because the "article" was in Spanish and only seemed to concern Spain. I first wanted to note that "impossible to verify" is a hyperbole, because anyone who speaks Spanish could verify that content. Furthermore, I wanted to point out basic Wikipedia policies. See WP:NONENG. We allow non-English sources, but do have a preference for English ones if available. Therefore, I don't believe the rationale behind your deletion was in line with our policies. That said, I want to thank you for taking the time to work on improving Wikipedia, and want to encourage your continued contributions to our project. I just wanted to send out a friendly welcome, and words of encouragement to make sure you are editing in lines with our guidelines. If you have any questions, or need help, I'd be glad to assist. I'm going to leave you our default welcome message below, as it has a lot of helpful links. I wish you luck!
Welcome!
Hello, TheLuca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -Andrew c [talk] 17:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, TheLuca. You do good work here. I can see how this edit I reverted you on could be seen as out of place, but I believe most would see it more so as correctly placed. It is placed there because, as noted, rape of males, either by men or by women, is often disregarded as rape; it is not taken as seriously as male-female rape. And the section you added this information to already covers that; it therefore made the addition redundant. Flyer22 (talk) 22:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- I took this to the talk page: Talk:Rape#Male rape in Definitions section. Because edit warring is not the way to go. Flyer22 (talk) 18:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Rape
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rape. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AzureFury (talk | contribs) 16:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:TheLuca_reported_by_User:AzureFury_.28Result:_.29 AzureFury (talk | contribs) 17:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- You must have confused your block log with mine.[1] TheLuca (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppet
[edit]It has been established that you've engaged in sock puppetry and you have therefore been blocked indefinitely. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Shakehandsman (talk) 17:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |