User talk:TheGraduate2012

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, TheGraduate2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 01:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autoconfirmed

To become autoconfirmed, all you have to do is wait for four days. If there is an urgent edit you want to make you can bring it up to me or anyone else whom you've talked on on Wikipedia who knows their way around. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 01:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I can wait 4days. Thanks. --TheGraduate2012 (talk) 02:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you show me the page that image is found on? It would be easier to determine what kind of licensing status it has. And just to let you know, I'm probably going to have to ask someone else for help with this anyways because images are one of my weakest areas, but I'll make sure that either the image gets uploaded or (if the license isnt compatible) you can get a reasoning you'll understand for why we can't use it. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 18:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found it at http://www.cici-photos.com/albums/Leona/normal_58946508simplyinfatuated1118200925104AM.jpg. I'll get back to you in a few minutes. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 18:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe you can upload the image to Wikipedia because it doesn't say anywhere on the site that the images can be used freely, and Wikipedia's licensing policies are such that once an image appears on Wikipedia, it can be used freely anywhere else. Thus, we would need the consent of the people who host the photo website before we could display any of their photos. However, I don't work with images, and if you're still interested in uploading you may want to ask your question to a wider audience at this page. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 19:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Registered

I'm not sure what you mean by "a registered user". Everyone is automatically registered if they have an account ... is there something you found you couldn't do unless you become "registered" for it? Please show me if so. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it's to edit those pages, that's just the same as autoconfirmed. You'll be okay in a day or so. It is technically possible to get the autoconfirmed status early, but only an administrator can do that, and it isn't usually done for the purpose of regular editing (otherwise almost everyone would ask for it). -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you should hit the 4 day mark in just a few minutes if it's done in such a way that it's exactly timed to the minute you first registered. If not it'll be about a day. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 17:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGraduate2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I was recently coming to edit wikipedia, and I was found that I was blocked. When I looked for the reason it said that I was a sockpuppet of TrEeMaNsHoE, and while the editor that accused me wasn't sure, they thought we share the same interest in articles. I am here to ask for unblocking, because I am not TrEeMaNsHoE. I edit on a variety of articles, and the one he pended me for the same are just some of them. Nothing but an a few pages links the two of us, so I don't see why this happened . Please help.--TheGraduate2012 (talk) 21:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser- Confirmed sock of TrEeMaNsHoE (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGraduate2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No checkuser was used as it says, "No CU neccessary". If you will eview my edits, you will see that only some of my edits resemble TrEeMaNsHoE, and that I have made contributions to pages other thaan those. Another thing is that when I was looking at my case, I looked at the links and the evidence presented was for a user FiGlEaFbOoK, and not for me. Please review at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TrEeMaNsHoE.--TheGraduate2012 (talk) 01:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per checkuser confirmation stipulated below. Kuru ^talk 01:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am a checkuser, and before I declined the request above, I ran a query after Muzemike asked me privately for a sanity check. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGraduate2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did you see how the evidence submitted was for FiGlEaFbOoK, though.--TheGraduate2012 (talk) 02:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. NW (Talk) 02:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.