User talk:TheFranky

Hey Everyone!

Hey everyone(who visits my talk page), I'm new at Wiki and find it very neat and a nice community. If one of my articles has a problem, please leave the appropriate Tag and reply on my talk page saying what I did wrong, or how I can improve it. Thanks!

Speedy deletion of Upshift softwares

A tag has been placed on Upshift softwares requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message on my talk page. Please read notability guideline for companies and corporations for guidance as to notability of corporations etc . If a company is not notable, its article does not belong on WP. See also WP:SPAM. For guidance on your first article, see WP:YFA. – ukexpat (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Thanks for the message on my talk page. Yes sources are absolutely essential. One of the foundations of Wikipedia is verifiability via reliable sources. If an article cannot be verified by reliable sources, it will not last long in Wikipedia. – ukexpat (talk) 00:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shift Script‎

Hi there, can I suggest you look at WP:RS. The tags that you keep removing from your article are there because your sources do not appear to be independent 3rd party reliable sources. Removing the sources tags isn't healping your article, they are there to note what needs to happen to improve the article. I would suggest that some time be spent improving the article with independent reliable references so that it doesn't end up being marked for deletion. --Deadly∀ssassin
06:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, sorry I removed the warning because I added a few sources and thought that was good enough. Thanks for warning me, ill try to improve it with sources and wont remove it. Thanks again. =)

--TheFranky (talk) 19:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I just didn't want to think that the sources tags were some sort of criticism of your work. You still need to make sure that you improve the sources, because as they are I don't know if they're enough to save the article from deletion. Best of luck. --Deadly∀ssassin 04:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shift Script for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shift Script is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shift Script until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Padenton|✉ 08:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]