User talk:TheFixerUpper12

November 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sue Ellspermann, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 talk 07:44, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Karl Donitz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joji (musician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Koyyo (talk) 02:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Joji (musician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Also, read WP:NOTVAND. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Your user page says "I am me, don't touch me. I'm only here to update and work on Joji_(musician)". I believe that statement indicates that you should read WP:OWN, which basically says that no editor can "own" a page, and if they exhibit ownership behavior, it can lead to a block from editing. You might also take a look at WP:NPOV, which says that we must maintain a neutral point of view in our articles, and WP:CPUSH, which says that editors who "push" a particular point of view can be sanctioned even if they are always polite.

Reading these policy pages will, I think, be helpful to you in your future editing of Wikipedia. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 03:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]