User talk:TheEatery

Foodfacts

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Foodfacts, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.foodfacts.com/public/about.cfm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

http://spam.foodfacts.com

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

We Have Never Spamed Anyone

We have been on the internet for over 10 years and have never SPAM anyone I believe at one time Wikipedia ask us to add to their web site at that time we were just starting ourselves Now we have data and try to make Wikipedia better and were called spamer

stan@foodfacts presidentTheEatery (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

When you repeatedly add links to the same website on multiple Wikipedia page, we call that spamming. You were warned to stop, and you continued to do it. Next time the links show up, the site will be blacklisted. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jamie

It appears that we are blocked

We were putting in ingredients in food products such as tident gum, pepsi, and other products. We put our name in so the information we are putting in is correct. How can we do this without it being spam? Stan18:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.103.121.164 (talk)

You can't do it. That's why you are blocked. If the link is added again, it will be blacklisted. The warnings explain our policy on external links. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jamie

OK not worth our time to inprove your site

thanks anyway

stan 98.221.229.127 (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Help me

February 2010

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheEatery for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. McGeddon (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Help me please

Blacklisted

Jamie when we try to talk to you you blacklisted us what did we do now

this is very unfair

Stan108.110.236.205 (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Given your persistence in this matter despite being told in clear terms that we don't allow link spamming, blacklisting is the most appropriate option here. It prevents other accounts from popping up later trying to spam the links again (as has already occurred at least once). There's nothing further to discuss. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jamie

Well back again this is what on the first page of the wikipedia intoduction

How can I contribute?

Don't be afraid to edit — anyone can edit almost any page, and we encourage you to be bold! Find something that can be improved and make it better - for example, spelling, grammar, rewriting for readability, or removing unconstructive edits. If you wish to add new facts, please provide references so they may be verified, or suggest them on the article's discussion page. Changes to controversial topics and Wikipedia's main pages should usually be discussed first.

Remember - you can't break Wikipedia; all edits can be reversed, fixed or improved later. So go ahead, edit an article and help make Wikipedia the best information source on the Internet!

it is saying one thing and your saying something else

Stan 108.110.236.205 (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Those two paragraphs are not the entire editing policy of Wikipedia.

We don't explicitly say things like "don't spam links to your own website!" or "hey, don't delete articles and replace them with swearwords!" to new users, or overwhelm them with a huge list of behaviours that aren't permitted by Wikipedia policy, we deliberately try to encourage them. The first time they make an inappropriate edit, we post a polite warning to their talk page explaining why it's inappropriate - it's up to them whether the read and respect that or not. --McGeddon (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

It's a moot point now, as the site has been blacklisted. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

==

Sorry

Jamie

at 70 years old I don't get it, I in no way tryed to get you made at us me I never tryed doing this on wikipedia I see it is to much for me to handle so sorry for getting you upset

StanTheEatery (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked ==

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.