User talk:TheDragonSlayer3000

Welcome!

Hello, TheDragonSlayer3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 16:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Michael Woodard

A tag has been placed on Michael Woodard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. EarthPerson 16:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Holmes Regional Medical Center on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.02:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Djibouti has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Djibouti was changed by Mjw1201 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918408 on 2014-12-25T20:23:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guy Fawkes mask. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Guy Fawkes mask was changed by Mjw1201 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905595 on 2014-12-25T20:26:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hellhound (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Reconrabbit were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone of writing is unacceptable for a Wikipedia article, with phrases such as "a rich history of operational excellence and innovation" and "As a premier demonstration team, the Hellhounds continue to push the envelope". No independent references are provided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hellhound and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Recon rabbit 17:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjw1201! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Recon rabbit 17:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hellhound

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hellhound, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Recon rabbit 18:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Recoil16. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Air Combat Command have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – Recoil16 (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 23:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Charles II of England. Unencyclopedic images may be added to the bad image list to prevent their display if used persistently for vandalism. General Ization ^Talk 23:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry TheDragonSlayer3000 (talk) 23:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too late; you're done. General Ization ^Talk 23:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I may have a say in that too? But when an account makes unconstructive edits since 2010, there's actually not much else than a block to be expected, and there has been far enough time to feel sorry and to stop... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for operating a disruption-only account.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]