Jump to content

User talk:TheDonquavious

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi TheDonquavious! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 05:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 05:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TheDonquavious! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 05:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sneako (March 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbrks were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– Pbrks (t • c) 16:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sneako (March 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 15:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. Can you tell me exactly which citations aren't suitable so I know what to get rid of? I don't want to get rid of anything unnecessarily. Also, what is "weasel wording" and "scare quotes"? Can you please elaborate? TheDonquavious (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind that last part. I read the "Words to Watch" section on Wikipedia and I understand that now. If possible, I would still like to know about the citations. TheDonquavious (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sneako (March 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 06:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sneako (March 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 06:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @BuySomeApples, I've resubmitted the article after making several changes. A majority of the sources are considered "Generally reliable" or "No consensus," on Wikipedia's Reliable sources chart. The tone is also objectively neutral as far as I'm aware, including the absence of peacock terms, but please give me specific examples if you believe otherwise. Also, there are no unsourced claims. TheDonquavious (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for cleaning up the sources somewhat, but every sentence or paragraph needs a ref btw. Since you resubmitted, I'll leave it to the next reviewer to assess the page. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matan Even (March 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 11:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Game Awards 2022 stage interruption has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Game Awards 2022 stage interruption. Thanks! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 14:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Zxcvbnm, an article by The Hi-Times covers it on January 10, 2023, so this should qualify as significant coverage past the event. I've added the article as a citation. TheDonquavious (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I replied to your message on my talk page. While I don't think that is enough, I have mentioned a source that could be enough for you to add to the page, so see about doing that and removing any redundant sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 16:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you TheDonquavious (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Game Awards 2022 stage interruption, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 17:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sneako has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sneako. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 01:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sneako has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sneako. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 01:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sneako (March 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Slywriter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sourcing is mediocre. Much of them outright unreliable and what's not is not really BLP reliable nor cover the subject in-depth. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED

If the creator has WP:THREE independent reliable sources that discuss in-depth and show the subject meets Wikipedia definition of notability, creator can leave a note on my talk pages with them.

Otherwise, the lengthy discussion at WP:TEA and a review of the sources as they stand show further work on this draft will be a waste of the creator's and reviewer's time.

Slywriter (talk) 15:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advice regarding the lead sections of articles

[edit]

I recommend familiarizing yourself with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section - the lead section does not necessarily contain references, they are to be be sought in the body of the article in many cases. Make sure to check that before engaging in removal in the future, to avoid problems such as your recent edit to the Yam article which seemingly did not take that into account. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sneako

[edit]

Information icon Hello, TheDonquavious. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sneako, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]