User talk:TheDethklokGuy/Archive 1

Sound of the Beast: The Complete Headbanging History of Heavy Metal

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sound of the Beast: The Complete Headbanging History of Heavy Metal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Sound-of-the-Beast/Ian-Christe/e/9780380811274. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ...Fuck It?!

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The dethalbum II has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Dethalbum II

Have you even read my edit summary? Those sources are unreliable. Please see WP:RS for a general explanation of what's reliable and please do not recreate the article until you have found something more credible. Also, the article was put under deletion for the same reasons of insufficient (reliable) sources (AFD). Thank you. FireCrystal (talk) 04:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:000acsyp.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:000acsyp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:I-Am-Ozzy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:I-Am-Ozzy.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I Feel Like Playing

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on I Feel Like Playing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:61AuflMPkYL.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:61AuflMPkYL.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Evil-Never-Dies-toxic-holocaust.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Evil-Never-Dies-toxic-holocaust.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 20:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Davidravenski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Malconfort (talk) 20:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dethklok

Please don't remove sourced content like you did at Dethklok. If you disagree, bring it up on the talk page (preferably using proper English, not random words strung together that make no sense, like your last edit to the talk page). The source article clearly states "this is a brutal death metal album" (this is a direct quote, taken verbatim from the source). Therefore, your edit summary claiming that it isn't supported by the source is false. If you want the genre removed, try using one of the ways I suggested (WP:RFC, WP:RSN, etc). MrMoustacheMM (talk) 17:44, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you've really got to stop your disruptive editing. Your opinion is irrelevant where Wikipedia is concerned. You don't like that it says "brutal death metal"? Fine. I've given you suggestions on how to remove this sourced information, but you continue to ignore me. Why don't you actually try doing this the right way? It won't hurt, and you might learn something in the process. However, until you find a way to remove the information within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it's sourced, and should stay. WP:RSN might help you. It might not. But that's the nature of Wikipedia: we report what reliable secondary sources say, not what our own opinions are. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 01:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The full paragraph of that certain part is "The soundtrack for season one was released, appropriately titled "The Dethalbum" and it debuted at #21 on the Billboard chart. The highest debut/chart position ever for a death metal album. This isn't a typical sugar coated High School Musical/Miley Cyrus pre-teen snot fest that routinely rules the charts, this is a brutal death metal album (even though the lyrics deal with coffee and mermaids, but who's complaining?)." It doesnt make sense for him to randomly state the genre in that context, the "brutal" is a supportive word the author is using to emphasize the point he's trying to make that this isn't some mainstream pop album. Davidravenski (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Brendon small with his thunderhorse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brendon small with his thunderhorse.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dethklok live at mayhem 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dethklok live at mayhem 2011.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brendon Small 2011.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brendon Small 2011.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 12:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evil-Never-Dies-toxic-holocaust.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evil-Never-Dies-toxic-holocaust.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Metalocalypse Season 2 cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Metalocalypse Season 2 cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Dethklok - Metalocalypse Season III - The Dead Man cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dethklok - Metalocalypse Season III - The Dead Man cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Metalocalypse season 1 cover.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Metalocalypse season 1 cover.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]