User talk:TheDeathWikipedian
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, TheDeathWikipedian! Thank you for your contributions. I am Charlesdrakew and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Charles (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to School discipline, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TeaDrinker (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Does school use capital punishment?! XD
--TheDeathWikipedian (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not the place for jokes or goofing around. I have made your new page into a redirect. --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry. School never uses capital punishment. Only the state uses capital punishment.
--TheDeathWikipedian (talk) 16:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Detention (imprisonment) was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JeffJ (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TeaDrinker (talk) 00:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TeaDrinker (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)TheDeathWikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry for the vandalism. I won't ever vandalize Wikipedia again. Will you please unblock me?TheDeathWikipedian (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Accept reason:
On the condition that you do not vandalize. Any vandalism will result in a longer block. TeaDrinker (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
:)
[edit]Thanks for the early unblock. --TheDeathWikipedian (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Truancy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Truancy was changed by TheDeathWikipedian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954379 on 2012-04-14T16:13:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia by equating school discipline with prison or the death penalty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ElKevbo (talk) 20:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TeaDrinker (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)When you get out of jail
[edit]Come see me if you like.
Some things that are more fun that what you did:
- Catching vandals (rogue superhero style) and bringing them a world of trouble.
- Making articles on topics that will horrify readers.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
I wonder if this will work?
[edit]TheDeathWikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can you please unblock me? I will not resume vandalism again. TheDeathWikipedian (talk) 03:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given that you vandalised articles shortly after being unblocked on the condition that you would not do so, no. Nick-D (talk) 05:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Phew!
[edit]Glad I'm unblocked. :) --TheDeathWikipedian (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
The article Auralious has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No notability or context
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Balph Eubank ✉ 17:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)