User talk:TheDeadlyShoe

Welcome!

Hello, TheDeadlyShoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 03:16, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)

It's you!

Hi, TDS! — ceejayoz ^talk 01:31, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceejay. :) TheDeadlyShoe 01:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd save space and just post under this fellow's header... heya Shoe! I keep on getting onto obscure webboards and discovering that I missed you and Mehrunes by five minutes! So, in an attempt to kick fate in the neck, hello! It's Spatch... from DS... Kalthuras 08:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Darkspace may not be up for much longer, according to the rumors : /. Faustus made a public statement of sorts, saying that if the subscriptions don't pick up soon, DS will no longer be self-sustaining... I don't really play anymore, but losing the lobby and the few people still in it is going to like having your sitcom apartment burned down. On a lighter note, I'm fairly certain that Mehrunes will be all over the Supreme Commander modder boards sooner or later... Kalthuras 22:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its had about the same sub numbers for quite a while now, but yes, Faust did say it was nearing break-even. I'm thinking this next patch (Two Weeks) is pretty much going to be a make-or-break patch, since if it sucks, then DS will drop below break-even, whereas a success might keep it afloat another year or two until it can actually be good. Whether it can actually go anywhere is another question; I don't think it'll ever improve much. But I'm old, and cynical.

Anyway, hi there. I miss your random name changes.... though I don't actually hang out in DS much anymore, as my computer is dead. Good times. Yeah, I got nothin. See ya around. Shigernafy 03:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, if you still check this, they've finally released Darkspace version 1.500 (So many things were changed that 1.484 wasn't really appropriate). It's not perfect, but it is very, very good, so far. Bombing is harder than it was in 1.480- as opposed to the easy prestige it was in 481-483, and dreadnaughts are ships to be feared. Check it out! Kalthuras (talk) 07:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kali

Any chance you could post some links to where CCP said planetary flight wasnt going to be in Kali? Ta P.S., Are you the same TDS that played neveron? ceejayoz's nick also sounds familiar ;)

--Bastion 15:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the only info I could find was from Fanfest 2004. --Bastion 16:09, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Phoebe Zeitgeist

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Phoebe Zeitgeist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gateslodore.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Gateslodore.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are still interested in having this image restored for your re-uploading, please leave a note on my talk page. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quazal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quazal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quazal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]