User talk:TheDeadRatInTheCornerOfMyRoom52

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please see TheDeadRatInTheCornerOfMyRoom52 for the ANI case. Jerm (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Chilling Adventures of Sabrina episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 16:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Requested moves

You are not doing it correctly. You are not supposed to edit Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions which have a note that says that. You are supposed to place {{subst:Requested move}} on the Talk of the article you are requesting to move. — YoungForever^(talk) 18:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Template:Requested move to learn how to do it properly. — YoungForever^(talk) 20:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SpoilerTV

Please stop using SpoilerTV as sources because SpoilerTV is not a reliable source as it is a fan-operated website. — YoungForever^(talk) 22:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of HBO Max original programming, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 19:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of HBO Max original programming without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 04:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, High School Musical: The Musical: The Series, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Paramount+ original programming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showtime. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of A24 films

added a link pointing to The Cut

List of Hulu original programming

added a link pointing to The Cut

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Magitroopa (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at List of Hell's Kitchen episodes. Magitroopa (talk) 03:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Raven's Home episodes. And List of Sydney to the Max episodes and Just Roll with It. A plethora of warnings and one block, and yet you continue to be disruptive. It's time to knock it off. Amaury • 20:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Columbia Pictures films (2020–2029)

added a link pointing to Variety

List of Netflix exclusive international distribution programming

added a link pointing to Variety

List of Netflix original films (2021–)

added a link pointing to Variety

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

what does it even mean? – ChannelSpider (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Patrick Star Show, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Paramount+ original programming shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 in American television, you may be blocked from editing. I see you have been warned multiple times for disruptive editing/behavior, and appear to have learned nothing from them. Content must be verifiable, and it's unclear how a show ending can be verified without a source. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 21:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Grand Delusion. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Peacock original programming without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 20:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

It looks weird EverestMachine 4001 (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alerting to an edit request

Hi, I made an edit request to 2021 in American television, two actually but the first one wasn't with the formal formatting and was already archived, but they refer to certain overlooked programming changes this year that haven't been reflected in the article, and I didn't want it to be ignored in case few people actually check the talk page these days. Since you are a frequent editor I figured you'd be the guy to ask--141.157.254.24 (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Paramount+ original programming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We Baby Bears Episode List

I wanted to combine the writer and director table into one for this show, because the first episode is written and directed all by the same person, and I want the formatting similar to the original show. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Warped!. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury • 21:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of HBO Max original programming, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Throast (talk | contribs) 22:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mr. Mayor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 20:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Grace and Frankie episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Alex_21_TALK 23:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Mr. Mayor, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Again, please stop you disruptive editing. The official NBC Mr. Mayor website says it is not part of season 2. We go by the official website. — YoungForever^(talk) 14:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You are committing WP:SYNTH by repeatedly stating that season 4 has been picked up. Nowhere does it say season 4 has been ordered. CartoonnewsCP (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. According to the reliable sources, there are sixteen episodes in the third season. Please stop your WP:DE CartoonnewsCP (talk) 05:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eureka! (2022 TV series). BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:12, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Continuing to change episode numberings at own whim, just like above warnings telling otherwise. Magitroopa (talk) 13:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Flight Attendant. Please read the article itself. The article said most likely to end, it never stated explicitly that it was confirmed as canceled. You can't claimed it is canceled when it was never explicitly said that. You are add WP:SYNTH which is part of WP:OR. — YoungForever^(talk) 20:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at That Girl Lay Lay, you may be blocked from editing. BrickMaster02 (talk) 14:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked for one month from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Edit warring, vandalism, failure to communicate. Cullen328 (talk) 14:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheDeadRatInTheCornerOfMyRoom52 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Some of my edits were not disruptive and I think that I should be unbanned because I will actually listen before I keep making the same edits. On the page for The Flight Attendant, I realized that the show is most likely not over and I stopped repeating the same edit that it was.

Decline reason:

Yes, some of your edits were not disruptive, which is why you're only blocked for a month. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:35, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheDeadRatInTheCornerOfMyRoom52 (talk) 15:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheDeadRatInTheCornerOfMyRoom52 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is not necessary at all because I understand why I have been blocked. I just making disruptive edits and spamming the same thing over and over again when it ended up not even being true. If get unblocked, when I make an edit that might be considered disruptive, I will stop spamming it after the first time someone will have to talk to me about it.

Decline reason:

Sorry, I think you need to determine how your edits were disruptive, tell us what you would do instead, and not make any more disruptive edits.Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]