User talk:TheDarkKnight42

Welcome!

Hello, TheDarkKnight42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! TomStar81 (Talk) 09:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile AR

Hello, You have removed my additions about mobile AR twice. Could we please have a dialogue about this on the Augmented Reality talk page.(PeterQuain (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

(reply) I will re-post the section without the links. However, I believe that it should be considered at least as an external link. The only place to get more information about this technology is on there site, which also provides links to the work the University of Canterbury and Georgia Tech. are doing on the subject. Please let me know if you think this would be acceptable.(PeterQuain (talk) 20:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

((reply))

Why don't you simply add links to both universities? Anyway, if you plan to add relevant links, don't do it on top of others, add your links at the bottom...

(reply)There is relevent information about the subject within the Media Power Site. I will add the link at the bottom per your request. Please let me know if you would like further details about info that can be found on the site and why is is relevent.(PeterQuain (talk) 20:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

((reply))

Yes please, I did not found many relevant info about AR on this site.

(reply)Why can the funding not be considered part of the history? Also that doesn't explain why you removed the catagory about mobile AR.(PeterQuain (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

((reply)) History is about advance in the "state of the art", funding could be a cause of advance, but it is not in itself.

I Removed your addition because if was full of self-promoting links to your companies.

(reply) Dark Knight, I am not Carl Freer none the less I do care about mobile AR and think it deserves a place in the augmented reality entry and because Media Power is the company developing mobile AR it's important they be included as well. There are instances where Wikipedia does show a relationship to companies for certain entries is it is applicable. Movie camera would be a great example. The first image you see is of an Arri cam and later in the page is says some of the most popular 35mm cameras used today are Arriflex, Moviecam, and Panavision models. Mobile AR is a viable piece of the Augmented Reality puzzle and Media Power is the largest developer of Mobile AR the same way that Panavision or Arri are the largest developers of 35mm equipment. All of the information I provided was educational, was neutral, and most importantly verifiable. If you would like to dispute these point please respond on my talk page.(PeterQuain (talk) 14:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

(reply) History is defined in the wiki entry as To describe the history of Augmented Reality is also to describe man's journey of adding to the natural world he was born in. So if a man plants a seed and grows a tree how is that different from a company issuing grants to develop augmented reality.(PeterQuain (talk) 14:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]